does someone know how much it takes for an article to get re iewer?
Do you mean how much time, if so, It can be a day, to a few weeks.
2 Likes
yes that, how long do they take
cause i have some from over a month
and editors dont anser
i have 4 wainting, 3 have been waiting a month aprox , one of the over 2 months
It has been really slow right now so I think they might just hav a lot of submissions or are dealing with issues or somthing
1 Like
Hi,
Regarding your articles, the reason they have not been reviewed is that there are concerns about the way the articles are being produced and whether they meet the Wiki’s expectations for contributor-written content.
The Wiki is a community-driven project, and while we don’t expect everyone to have perfect English, we do expect contributors to have a genuine understanding of the content they submit and to be able to explain, verify, and discuss the information and wording used in their articles. In this case, there is a significant discrepancy between the quality and complexity of the submitted articles and your usual written communication, which has raised concerns about how much of the content is actually being authored and reviewed by you.
Because of these concerns, we are currently not going to allocate volunteer review time to these articles. This is not intended as a judgement of you personally, nor is it because English is not your first language. We simply need to ensure that the limited time our volunteers have is being spent on contributions where the author is actively involved in producing and reviewing the material.
If you wish to continue contributing, I would encourage you to work on articles where you can demonstrate your own understanding of the subject, sources, and wording, and where you can make revisions based on reviewer feedback. Once that is established, we can reconsider reviewing your future contributions.
I hope you can understand that this is a matter of maintaining the Wiki’s standards and making reasonable use of our volunteers’ time, rather than a personal decision against you.
i think the problem is that i do not ha e cambridge C2
mensagge from wiki guy. obiusly in those articles i take care of the spelin and those things
or whatever the probles is, i did not read it completely
What do you mean “whatever the probles is”? It’s crystal clear; it’s your writting. Even though you say you had care to work on it, throughout this thread you made clear that english is not your first language and you made even clearer that your writting was the problem the whole time. That’s why they rejected your draft for an article.
1 Like
as i said before, in the article i review the gramar, here… well u have seen it
Seems like theyre worried about translation software/ AI
It does make sense for the record