It does but as we have discussed we have no images or documents to confirm it can carry 2 on each hardpoint.
We still dont have evidence of it being able to do so from Mil, from payload drawings.
Whereas we have absolute proof JAGM can be carried in the same configuration as the Hellfire.
From official US Army sources and the manufacturer of the missile and the design document.
Why isn’t the X-4 mentioned in the changelog?
yes, blowout panels still work just fine
i hate the buyers remorse gaijin keeps giving me when i buy premium vehicles. if i knew they were going to nerf the Wilkinson this hard i would not have bought it.
2 Likes
please read our forum guideliness:
The Users are not permitted to use red color when drafting and designing posts and signatures on the Forum. The red font is reserved for Administration and the Website Managers.
thank you.
Do you know there is something called sarcasm?
That is on you. You forgot to add /s. In war thunder forum of all places.
The new update made the game unplayable in PS4, the frames keep dropping all the time. Is there anything I could change in the setting to optimize the game?
@Smin1080p_WT hey so is there a reason why the B-66 isnt getting the radar track and target leading function for its defensive gun? Was it a mechanic that was too difficult to program or was it a decision made on balancing reasons or did yall find something that said it didnt have those functions?
As has been mentioned elsewhere, USS Roanoke was left off (same secondary gun, same capability).
The key difference there is roanoke hasn’t really changed much without the capability, also its had it removed for a few updates now
Yes, but if it’s just a rate-of-fire-based rule (that ROF guns faster than 30 rd/min cannot be a co-fired secondary alongside capital ship primaries) then it needs to be consistently applied across the board. If it’s a different rule, tell us what it is. Can’t just be vibes-based.
Roanoke lost the ability a while ago now
Oops, my bad, should have checked in game. Thanks!
I believe it was one of the first and honestly it made sense
Leaves open the question why the <2s rate of fire rule wouldn’t apply to the single 76mm secondaries with similar rates of fire on the Barker/Litchfield/Wood though. Is there an exception being made if the secondary is only a single gun?
(Not saying I want that capability to be removed from them too, doesn’t really mean much for their capability either way, just trying to understand the thought process.)
Honestly im not sure it may be because those are manually loaded and Honestly are beyond inefficient for anything
One update and Gaijin basically self-reported that anyone in charge of game balance or NATO vehicles was essentially fired or sent to the frontlines. Because who signed off on buffing the Kh-38s, giving Russia the best SPAA (not to mention the only one that can continue to fire after losing its control unit) and the best helicopter-launched A2G missile, and pausing their realistic module implementation while denying it to NATO MBTs and also nerfing their blowout panels with no proof, reports, or explanation.
War Thunder now has two infamous “characters” under its employment; Basement Guy and The Interior Propaganda Officer. Like the fact they don’t even want to address it is crazy. “Hey, we can see how this seems like blantant bias. Here’s how we plan on addressing it…” is asking too much.
6 Likes
yes, problem is it’s hard to tell if something is sarcastic over text unless it’s made somewhat obvious
That’s why people tend to put “/s” a the end or by alternating between upper and lowercase
“tHeRe Is No DoCuMeNtS oR vIdEoS sHoWiNg BlOwOuT pAnElS wOrKiNg AnD sAvInG cReW.”
1 Like
wrong
TAN SAM
seems working fine to me, almost as there wasnt any change made to them, this update
it is a nerf, it has more drag and if you are talking about the missile turning around, that dosent work with the Kh-38, becasue you cant launch it out side of the seeker gimbal limits
1 Like