Would make the pacing a bit more bearable than it is currently
2 Likes
This is true but this change would also be a soft-nerf to Su-30SM2 and soft-buff to Eurofighter and potential F-15Es with AESA in the future.
As of now, Su-30SM2 is very very strong in the current meta where it gets a faster air spawn at 1380kmh than other planes like Eurofighter spawning at 1150kmh despite Su-30SM2 having a better engine now.
3 Likes
The addition of “fatal damage” into naval mode is a very good thing, thanks a lot! Add nation-based MM for NRB, fix RoF mess (give every ship cannon theoretical RoF maybe?), give frigates their own spawn point and I’ll enjoy naval battles a lot.
1 Like
Both Pe-8 and Lancaster are essentially dead now.
Destruction radius on both FAB-5000 and H.C. 12000LB was pretty much halved.
I get how dying to these things was probably frustrating, but they were already insanely situational. Unless you got a perfect map, enemies played into you and you managed to jump into one of those very expensive planes quickly, you would simply end up with 1-2 kills and be a free kill from that point onwards.
Now they have destruction power comparable to a 4000LB barell bomb before the nerf, how are you suposed to justify sacrificing versatility, good flight performance and whatnot for 1 of those big bombs now? You can’t.
Last strategic bombers with any degree of viability in this game have been castrated and are no longer worth using at all.
What the hell happend to the damage models? It’s genuinely horrible, HITs left and right…
The “disabling aramament” part is a good change, but the damage is SO inconsistent.
Please review that.
it can have it but it’s useless without tp,
And ofc gajin nerfed Gripen E the second time if it wasn’t enough first cas options and now br it’s clear wich nations are more liked, if y’all increase the BR then at least fix the spice loadout let us take one of the 2 pylons underneath the belly with the TP
12.7 for ground was way too low for it.
2 Likes
that is true, but nevertheless it should be able to bring 1 of the 2 spice 250 pylons with targeting pod
Oh no my undertiered plane gets moved up, how could Gaijin do this!
2 Likes
Thats another issue regarding triple belly pylons being modelled as one
my wrong modelled plane is being nerfed instead of fixed and then put on proper br, also we will see if devs will EVER fix the pylons cuz I don’t really think they will favor the nation that would be able to go toe to toe with russia
It was already undertiered despite being wrongly modeled.
Hell it’s still undertiered in air RB even in it’s current state, only for ground RB it got fixed.
1 Like
and what does it change, i want my plane to be modeled fairly for it to be actually good in GRB, I don’t mind 14.3 material being 14.3 and 13.0 in GRB if its modeled right, and it did NOT get fixed in grb it got nerfed
Which is fair, but saying something like:
When the launch BRs clearly show that the Gripen E is getting a pretty beneficial treatment compared to most nations.
2 Likes
that’s right some nations are more liked, and the 12.7 in GRB was clearly not ready and everyone knew that
It wasn’t nerfed; A clipping issue was fixed in a manner [which was a more complex bug]; and there’s also a model issue with the targeting pod that needs fixing.
If you want 4 [or more] SPICE 250s back with a targeting pod, produce a bug report that shows it can carry both for good measure. One that can counter an alleged clipping report.
Edit adding this for good measure:
1 Like
I would not call that a fix. They messed up and modelled TGP pylons and belly pylons wrong, put the TGP incorrectly which made these weapons clip into eachother. IRL that would not be the case
3 Likes
Clipping issue would have not been the case in the first place if it was modeled correctly
2 Likes