Submarines come next year very likelly, i hope sweden also get them
sweden will most likely be one of the last nations as it doesnt even have a naval line yet
no one forgot subs I think they want to give countrys more anti-sub weapons like the ARSOC system so sub won’t be op when they come
China as well
enyone else have a issue where the usersight forlder dosent exsist in file manager yet you can accsess them in game?
“kids these days” for something that will take months to grind and is near 1:1 to the previous one
radar dont mean shit if there arent missiles to go with it
saying subs will be OP is so funny, realistically they will be very meh and very boring to play unless they give us cold war era subs with wire guided or wake homing torpedoes
well that’s why the F-4E exists.
You should be able to take it out in a frontal aspect if you’re using the AIM-7.
thats cool shame im talking about being in the jagaur
Damn, no fixes to the AV-8A and AV-8C’s cockpits, and no ALE-37 CM pod for the AV-8C yet :(
never know it’s not like it’s gonna be WOWS subs
bro what? it didnt need better missiles to take advantage of the new radar
Doubt subs will be “OP”. They are way too slow and cumbersome
idk about slow cold war era subs can hit some pretty goofy speeds, and the soviets have some terrifying heavy weight torpedos
Actually, the J-15C is significantly faster than the J-10C during a climb. It starts to accelerate more quickly than the J-10C after reaching about 600 km/h at low altitude. This means the J-15C takes less time to reach high altitude and maintains a higher energy state once it gets there.
jas39e get 16 spice250?wtf gaijin? why dont you just delete Israel tree
However, it is indeed true that the J-15C experiences a noticeable struggle in power output when performing high-altitude maneuvers to evade missiles.
you are aware the spice 250 isnt the only thing in the israeli tech tree right?
why f16i cant get 16 spice? you think jas39e have the same br with the shit sufa is balance?
and most of them arent ingame for the same old “balancing reasons”