War Thunder "Line of Contact" - Changelog

[_Renzo]

Which is fair, but saying something like:

@Calstone_LightO

it’s clear wich nations are more liked

When the launch BRs clearly show that the Gripen E is getting a pretty beneficial treatment compared to most nations.

[Calstone_LightO]

that’s right some nations are more liked, and the 12.7 in GRB was clearly not ready and everyone knew that

[AlvisWisla]

It wasn’t nerfed; A clipping issue was fixed in a manner [which was a more complex bug]; and there’s also a model issue with the targeting pod that needs fixing.

If you want 4 [or more] SPICE 250s back with a targeting pod, produce a bug report that shows it can carry both for good measure. One that can counter an alleged clipping report.

Edit adding this for good measure:

Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Yeah in-game the model is incorrect. The TGP pylon is too far in which results in them clipping into each other. [IMG_5109] But IRL the pylon for the pod sits further put and is angled which gives plenty of room. [IMG_5111] Also in the image used in the report to get SPICE on the Gripen it can be seen with both the TGP and SPICE mounted at the same time. [image]

[Michael-IR]

@AlvisWisla

A clipping issue was fixed.

I would not call that a fix. They messed up and modelled TGP pylons and belly pylons wrong, put the TGP incorrectly which made these weapons clip into eachother. IRL that would not be the case

[Calstone_LightO]

Clipping issue would have not been the case in the first place if it was modeled correctly

[JimmieJugend]

Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Yeah in-game the model is incorrect. The TGP pylon is too far in which results in them clipping into each other. [IMG_5109] But IRL the pylon for the pod sits further put and is angled which gives plenty of room. [IMG_5111] Also in the image used in the report to get SPICE on the Gripen it can be seen with both the TGP and SPICE mounted at the same time. [image]

[AlvisWisla]

There you go.

[Calstone_LightO]

yea there i go, this proves it can carry it without any issue and the problem is on gajins modeling side, i hope they are in the process of fixing it to be able to carry it again and that i won’t stay like that

[joshje100]

@AlvisWisla

It wasn’t nerfed; A clipping issue was fixed

It’s not really fixing the issue, it’s just ignoring the fact they modelled it incorrectly.

@AlvisWisla

If you want 4 [or more] SPICE 250s back with a targeting pod, produce a bug report that shows it can carry both for good measure

Which is what was shown in the report to give it SPICE in the first place.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/STcqqtKK1jME

The issue isn’t about compatibility, we can see that clearly through said report and the fact they accepted it. The issue is on the incorrect modelling of it and their “fix” of artificially nerfing it and not actually fixed the model in the first place.

[Smugspite]

its a good change

@Calstone_LightO

And ofc gajin nerfed Gripen E the second time if it wasn’t enough first cas options and now br it’s clear wich nations are more liked,

stop crying that something clearly under bred and overpowered was nerfed jesus

[Michael-IR]

There is already a counter report to this change they did and already accepted too

[141_allen]

@Smin1080p_WT Are there gonna be dev blogs for JAS-39E, Su30SM and J-10C, cause feel like the devs kinda missed half the update right there. I would also love to get a few more wall papers.

[Smugspite]

why would we get a dev blog after the update has come out lol, also he already said not all planes tanks and ships get dev blogs

[Michael-IR]

@Smugspite

why would we get a dev blog after the update has come out lol

we had post update dev blogs before

[Smugspite]

dont really see the point tbh

[Michael-IR]

Dev blogs are cool

[Smugspite]

are pack premiums not on sale atm?

[Michael-IR]

They will be after 24th

[Smugspite]

oh rip

[Calstone_LightO]

and i guess you also say that the kh38 isn’t op 🤣