Plain truth right there.
If you denounce the bias → post gets flagged.
If you say you loose 80% of 10.7 GRB games against Russia, they’ll tell you all american players are bad at this BR, and that is why Russia wins.
Alway an excuse, but never the truth lol.
Yeah sure, and that’s why Germany has a 40% winrate at top tier. Because all german players don’t know what they’re doing, right.
Also, that’s why Russia + China has a 80% winrate in sim battle. It’s because russian players know what they’re doing, and NATO don’t.
And when you play 30 10.7/13.0 GRB games in a row and loose 80% of the time against Russia, it’s again because you played alongwith bad people in those 80% games against Russia.
There is no point arguing with you people, it’s like talking to a wall. You just don’t want to see your russia line ups being nerfed, lol.
Leopard 2A7 is the best MBT in the game, AESA eurofighter is one of the best top tier planes, IRIS-T is the best SAM stat-wise
Yes, they are shit players
I don’t main Russian ground, I personally don’t enjoy it.
Give me actual good MBTs please
Jeez, you haven’t even played more than one nation…
This is also incredibly funny because France had the single best top tier plane for an entire year with no counter.
Yet you’re here complaining
not most of the time but always
Pretty close to 80%.
yeah so no wonder, this is pretty much purely due to LDIRCM helis and KH-38 I bet
I mean granted is he played 10 games and lost 8 of them to Russia, it would be 80% to him specifically. Yes the 57% is an average across ALL games but it doesn’t factor games unique to each player. That’s why you get discussions like these.
its this matchmaker specifically for anything after WW2
And for your point on “just aim for the lower plate”, what if that’s not an option? On MBTs I have a backup option of shooting the driver’s port/breech, but on the BMPT the LFP is the only viable weakpoint to hit frontally unless you want to pixel hunt the cannon breeches (and hope that player doesn’t have any more ATGMs)
My point of aiming for the lower frontal plate is not to be used as argument to how stupid is. I’m mocking @MR_BOOMBASTICc to neglect how T58 was unbalanced using the quote:
That would magically make the vehicle more fair, this also applies to the BMPT and how lazy Gaijin handles these damage models in-game. Almost that it seems that doesn’t work, some penetrators can pierce through Terminators’ front arc turret, although not very reliable it was one of the ways I was destroyed the most when I played BMPT last time.
10 games is also a terrible sample size btw, not accurate at all as even tiny changes can screw it over
After I got the 8.2KD I died once, that single death resulted in my KD dropping a LOT. Now it’s much lower than before
Statshark has a significantly larger sample size, making it more accurate.
Isn’t drivers port an option?
On the 5 crew BMPT you only kill the guys in the turret and it’s a rather small spot to hit.
I was merely referring to his 80% generalization. Most players like him would absolutely quit after a 10 game streak like that.
you’re still disabling it
it’s similiar to shooting an MBT in the breech, disables turret crew but not its ability to move etc
The company doesn’t have political positions.
The company is so apolitical that they ban all political speech.
Your posts’ shilling for Russian vehicles when it’s so obvious that Soviet vehicles are treated like everyone else [for better and worse].
T-90M and Abrams stuck using unclassified armor data.
Mig-29 being chronically negatively incorrect.
BMPT and Puma being introduced at ridiculously low BRs cause Gaijin didn’t think they’d be powerful at those BRs.
ok
Why are you using a 6.7 tank at top tier?
