Again, even acknowledging my bias, the VT4A1 is clearly supposed to be substantially better than what they ended up releasing in game and some garbage hybrid of stats that gaijin pulled out of the wazoo, and yet during the entire dev server I saw not only very clear and substantive evidence, as well as the tech mods rejecting them half the time, even resorting to calling the community trying to deceive them? How is gaijin going to deliver a proper product if the bug report mod team is behaving like this?
Nah, it’s one of the few actually useful and meaningful changes.
Then please communicate more with us about the Leopard 2a7v missing armor
1 Like
the news skull-sign should be placed on the mini-map, instead the “!”, which is not good visible.
How do such mistakes make it to Live version?
EDIT: Challenger 3 TD’s cheeks have been hotfixed!
I am very happy with the speed at which this specific issue was addresed.
Leopard 2A7V and M1A2 SEPv2 are still a big mess, but at least now I can grind and look forward for Challenger 3 TD, hahah (even if many issues still persists with CR3 and the 2s, at least this one was addressed quickly!)
10 Likes
Yes 50mm plate should give 7mm of protection
2 Likes
That moment when Challenger 3 has 100+mm less worth of KE and 400mm less worth of CE in the turret than Challenger 2.
Challenger 3 TD was the tank I was looking forward the most after Leopard 2A7V…
Now it turns out both are tremendously underperforming. Welp.
EDIT: Challenger 3 TD’s cheeks have been hotfixed!
I am very happy with the speed at which this specific issue was addresed.
Leopard 2A7V and M1A2 SEPv2 are still a big mess, but at least now I can grind and look forward for Challenger 3 TD, hahah (even if many issues still persists with CR3 and the 2s, at least this one was addressed quickly!)
5 Likes
China, Great Britain, France, the United States, Italy, etc., make these national tanks terrible, just to update the game before Christmas
At this point I’m wondering what even is the point of having a Dev server, previously there usually were 2 Dev servers for a major update, which allowed people to actually submit fixes so they can carry out, and have the time to, but now all the dev server amounts to is basically a demo of the final state because nothing ever gets fixed, so once again what even is the point of having a Dev server if it doesn’t serve the purpose of a Dev server anymore?
2 Likes
Rushed update lmao
I don’t know why Gaijin decided to half-ass this update so bad. I would have loved to see the Dev server stay open longer if it meant refining and ironing out this update more. Would have given more time to implement spall liners in a more balanced manner as to where most nations could get them instead of this abject BS we have now where only a few nations are getting such a meta changing feature. It would have also gave Gaijin more time to come to decisions regarding armor changes for tanks where it is blatantly underperforming or alleged to be inaccurate, such as ongoing issues with the Abrams, Challengers, Leclercs, and Arietes.
4 Likes
You do realize it was passed along as a suggestion and not a bug fix right.l?
He. Does. Not. Know.
It has been sent to developers, they might not even have looked at it yet. They have to read all the material double-check the sources so that nothing was tampered with in the texts/report. Check the validity of the sources and make sure they come from reliable places.
Yes it should have been fixed before release, I would not have minded a delay before release of update to first check the bugs and fix a lot of stuff.
But you can’t reasonably think that EVERYTHING will be fixed in just a few days. It’s definitely not the only bug report they have to go through. And they can’t really prioritize between specific reports unless they are game breaking. So it’s probably placed in a queue of reports and will be looked at soon enough (probably faster than others going by the community backlash).
But calm down dude, noone knows yet and how can they answer before they have even looked at it?
2 Likes
I was honestly under the impression that we were gonna get a Dev 2 given how insanely broken dev 1 was and that mikegoesboom sort of implied that Italy was gonna get something, turns out nope nothing was gonna get fixed and evidently fuck people who expected gaijin to actually be incompetent and take feedback seriously.
Yeah, I always feel bad about Smin and other Community Managers and moderators during times like these.
The developers commit huge mistakes and the messenger/intermediary staff are the ones to get shot in the crossfire.
7 Likes
Update is totally rushed. Bad configs, broken balance, broken armor for NON RUSSIAN vehicles.
Look like it was made only to get another wave of hate and content for 2024 roadmap.
Gaijin never learns from mistakes.
4 Likes
approve
Only if you were the shooter, i’ve had several times where a few tanks are all shooting at the same target and then only one player knows if the enemy is dead or not making the others fire more rounds unnecessarily.
Especially if the enemy is inside smoke, or has run behind a building before you shot him and someone else kills him. Then you got no info if he died or just took damage or just a glansing blow before. Now you at least know he is dead.
Every new vehicle is broken in some way
But not T-90M and su-27)
2 Likes
They are clearly the only broken vehicle because they work.
Clueless.
1 Like
You should brace yourself → germany have not a lot to offer now.