It looks to be an R-27EP, this one was previously shown at other exhibitions. Whatever seeker is inside could just be a placeholder but the colored radome is only seen on R-27P variants.
Obviously the actual seeker being shown appears to be a 9B-1103 variant of unspecified size. The 9B-1032 seen in the R-27P guidance unit looks more like the one on the right;
Why was the r-77 chosen over the r27ea?
From everything I can find, the r27ea would be vastly better in any situation that is not dogfighting range.
Better time to target, better energy, faster, etc etc.
The missile seemed quite a bit cheaper to mass produce and the parts designed to be easier to maintain / keep in storage. Shelf life would be higher, probability of kill much improved with the accuracy provided by grid fins. Maneuverability considerably enhanced against an enemy that was expected to be far more aware and maneuverable than the previous generation. Of course, it is lighter and one could carry more of them in theory.
Oh, didn’t know they only did radar seekers. I just don’t know who manufactured the IR seekers for 24T and 27T, so I was just looking for any book I could find.
The R-23 and R-24 do not have proper “IRCCM” but are more resistant to flares. Likely just a reduction in FoV.
The R-27T documentation from the Moscow Aviation Institute is much more in depth but does not seem to have much on the actual function of the IRCCM. It covers mostly the guidance, motor, radar seeker, etc. The IR features seem to be more secretive. It is implied the IRCCM of R-27T is much better than what we see and the same goes for the R-73 data.
Dev response is that the game engine cannot handle gateWidth smaller than 0.5 for air to air missile IRCCM currently, there exists stuff with smaller FoV in-game but these are balanced in other means. They essentially stated all IRCCM missiles are nerfed intentionally.