Typical “my source is my gut feeling” that is not even worth to argue with
2 Likes
It’s always so funny to see how chinese players decide all the time for thai players how they feel about something without actually questioning them
Especially when most of the thai players I’ve seen thinks quite opposite
4 Likes
Good name, bro
Don’t forget that they inherited a soviet trait - a necessity to constantly lie about things as well.
IF the documentation were declassified, they were looked into however certain countries tend to fabricate the authenticity and performance of their vehicles. So things need to be taken with a massive grain of salt.
One more thing Gaijin is not a Chinese Company, nor care.
1 Like
I primarily play France, so I know how it is to get your vehicles butchered for the sake of others to use them as punching bags
Unlike the Soviets, China doesn’t share much information so I would bet they’re either accurately described or maybe even better in ways
I hope the VT4 and ZTZ99 get accurately fixed, I’d love to see more top tier than Leopard-Abrams-T-80
When Gaijin makes games, they often lack reliable real-world basis, yet when players point out the absurdities, they are demanded to provide completely credible sources.
1 Like
The performance of weapons from some countries may be weaker than their stated specifications. For example, the R-77 missile was tested under conditions where both the launch aircraft and the target were flying at high altitude and high speed in a head-to-head engagement.
In contrast, China often conceals the true performance of its weapons. For instance, the PL-15E missile successfully shot down a Rafale aircraft at a distance of 180 kilometers, exceeding its stated range of 145 kilometers.
Gaijin operates in China and has partnered with CDK sales platforms. The adorable cube-head accessory often placed by Chinese players on their vehicle roofs is an exclusive item for the Chinese region.
1 Like
i hope Gaijin will ad VT-4 to Thailand asap
1 Like
There is a difference between Effective firing range and how far it could operate, but the farther it gets from the Effective Firing range, the worse it will perform. So while it may have hit a “Rafale”.
Even then, this is a heavily disputed claim.
In fact, the Max Range of the PL15E is marked as 145km. As for the controversy, a judgment different from that of Indian media will be reached after seeing the wreckage of the M88 engine.
Max Range ≠ Max Firing Range.
There is a difference.