ZLT11 (23 tons) vs 25mm AP-T round of PGZ04A (63mm @ 0 meters range)
VT5 (33 tons) vs 25mm AP-T round of PGZ04A (63mm @ 0 meters range)
This is ridiculous, the Sprut-SD lost the competition for the Bangladesh army because the VT5 was noted to have much better protection, the VT5 armor in the game is hilariously bad. 15mm of RHA on the LFP lmao.
105mm caliber and below spalling (doesn’t matter what round)has always been rough against t90m and t80BVM for a while now. Most people don’t notice because most people don’t use light tanks in top tier lineups
You should compare Sprut-SD against PGZ04A with VT-5 then
think you mean ZBD04A
why would you compare Sprut with a SPAA anyway
He meant PGZ04’s AP-T round against Sprut SD’s armor
ah I see
The gap between VT-5’s gunner sight and gunner’s hatch seems too small in the game. In real life the gap is slightly wider.
the armor still wrong
Since VT-5 is getting a BR raise, can we get the BTA2 APFSDS now?
gaijin Can say ：NO
You can expect BVVD replying this to the CN community: Kytay receiving a new and better round?Yeah, nope!You should be stuck where you are now!
VT5 is now at 11.3 BR. Can we get the BTA2 APFSDS now?
Perhaps better protection should also be obtained
It’s gaijin you know, better protection is probably too much to ask for. At least give us 11.3 worthy BTA2 APFSDS.
Gaijin: Don’t even think about it
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lD00myi2QWZu
Bug report for the missing spall liners
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lD00myi2QWZu
Finally Gaijin accepted my report. Thanks Gaijin
VT5 missing Auto Tracker function for gunner // Gaijin.net // Issues
Bug report for the missing Auto Tracker function for gunner
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AVpRDrXCmvLi
Bug report for wrong hull ammo rack configuration
