You should compare Sprut-SD against PGZ04A with VT-5 then
think you mean ZBD04A
why would you compare Sprut with a SPAA anyway
He meant PGZ04’s AP-T round against Sprut SD’s armor
1 Like
ah I see
The gap between VT-5’s gunner sight and gunner’s hatch seems too small in the game. In real life the gap is slightly wider.
the armor still wrong
Since VT-5 is getting a BR raise, can we get the BTA2 APFSDS now?
8 Likes
gaijin Can say ：NO
2 Likes
You can expect BVVD replying this to the CN community: Kytay receiving a new and better round?Yeah, nope!You should be stuck where you are now!
3 Likes
VT5 is now at 11.3 BR. Can we get the BTA2 APFSDS now?
2 Likes
Perhaps better protection should also be obtained
It’s gaijin you know, better protection is probably too much to ask for. At least give us 11.3 worthy BTA2 APFSDS.
5 Likes
Gaijin: Don’t even think about it
2 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lD00myi2QWZu
Bug report for the missing spall liners
Armor near the mantlet isn’t modelled in game either.
5 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lD00myi2QWZu
Finally Gaijin accepted my report. Thanks Gaijin
4 Likes
VT5 missing Auto Tracker function for gunner // Gaijin.net // Issues
Bug report for the missing Auto Tracker function for gunner
4 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AVpRDrXCmvLi
Bug report for wrong hull ammo rack configuration
5 Likes
Gaijin don’t you think it’s time to add the BTA2 apfsds?
3 Likes
gaijin:sooooooooon™
1 Like