VK 30.02(DB)

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

I would like to sugges the Vk 30.02 (DB) which is the counter model made by Daimler Benz, to the VK 30.02(M) allready found in game made by MAN. It would give a similar performance tank for befor Panther and Tiger I to the ranks.

While the VK 30.02 (M) and later Panther was a result, to fight against the T-34, a development of german tanks, with a new sloped front for the required protection levels, which was befor only employed on Armored Cars, as on tanks the requirements were reached with Vertical plates which offered more internal space. The Vk 30.02(DB) however took lots of inspiration or pretty much allready a copy (tho with german componments) of the T-34.


Pictures:(Click to show)


image



image

image
image




image
image
image



Comparisson of MAN and DB Tanks:
image


The Pz IV was originally designed and intended as the Begleitwagen, short BW, a infantry support vehicle, armed with a short 7,5 cm gun. This was effective against infantry, fortified positions, artillery, MG nests and AT guns. However in 1941 with the invasion of the USSR, tanks came up, such as the T-34 and KV-1, which showed that the current models of the german army were insufficient in terms of armor and firepower. While they allready recived their extenstions such as Vorpanzer and generally increased to 5 cm armor as well as 5 cm Guns and special ammo such as Pzgr.40 and Gr.38 Hl/A. However development of improved models such as the Tiger and Panther were allready underway, it would still take time for them to be frontline ready, in numbers and available. Immediat solutions were required and on the the Pz III and IVs were at hand, to be rearmed. While there were multiple ideas, such as the 7,5 / 5,5 cm Conical guns, this meant in the end the L/43 and L/48 guns for the Pz IV, while the Pz III didnt have the greatest options without great rework, as such it only got the Conical guns for tests, in production the 5 cm L/60 and later switched to the 7,5 cm L/24 for infantry support.

The in development tanks were of course influenced in terms of characteristics by the enemy encountered tanks. This includes the Vk. 30.02 (DB), which more or less is a german copy of the T-34, however with german componments.
Unlike standart for Germany, and unused, except for the Nb.Fz., the DB variant has a rear mounted engine and transmission. All round upwards sloping and a front mounted turret.
While usually the turrets were allready done, designed by Krupp with the required armarment, and the companys only had to make a hull, Daimler Benz took its own turret designe, which was not interchangable, mainly due to smaller 1600mm turret ring, which was also its downfall.

Overall on paper, it was similar to the Vk.30.02(M) and (except the turrer) in line with the requirements, with the L/70 Rheinmetall gun per Wa.Prüf. Amt 6 requirements.

It did have 60mm frontal armor at 55°, 40mm side at 40° and back armor of 50mm at 25°. Roof was 15mm. The turret with 1600mm (unlike the MANs 1650mm) turret ring was 80mm at the front, 45 side and read and overall angled at 30°.
It was 9,015m long (including barrle), 3,280m wide and 2,690m high.

While the suspention may look similar and it also was an interleaved roadwheel suspention, it instead consisted of 4 sets of interleaved roadwheels in 3 rows. As its rather difficult to write, simply look at the 3D render in the Pictures. Overall there are 3 Blocks of Leave Springs, with double armos where on pivot points the Wheels are mounted on.

Powered was it by the Deimber Benz MB 507 Engine out of the own House. It was a water cooled V12 diesel engine, which powered the tank through a rear mounted KSG 8/200 hydraulic-assist transmission with L 600 C hydraulic, controlled differential which allready had regenerative steering mechanis.
This was a joined development of Daimler-Benz and Ortlinghaus, and had hydraulic multi-plate clutch, which resulted in easy to use and smooth gear changes. This coice was taken over from the previous Vk.20.01(DB), however had the downside of beeing rather long, compared to mechanical transmissions (see drawing under pictures). As well as was somewhat unusual, only used on small diesel switcher trains. To keep the tank shorter, it was placed side by side to the engine, with the powertrain going forward, left and then back. (See Drawing).

Internal fuel was 550 liter, with additional external tanks, with a range of 195 km and 140km off road. That was 200 liters less than the MAN designe with internal tanks alone. The top speed with 56km/s was also similar.

Cooling was similar to the Pz IIIs flow, sucked through the side protusions, over lateral mounted radiatos and out the back. It was circulated by 4 fans.

The crew was the standart 5, Driver, radio/MG operator, Gunner, loader, commander. Because of the so far forward mounted turret, it was also tested to put the driver in the turret, however after tests abandoned, because it was too complicated for the time.

Overall while a good tank, it was not accepted, due to multiple reasons, among, a different own turret, smaller turret ring, thinner tracks, not using the prefered Tortion bar suspention, read mounted transmission (greater chance to throw tracks, as experienced on the leichttraktor in 1928) (Tho Daimler found there to be no to minimal difference.) At the same time Daimler-Benz representatives also said, “Employment of the rear drive provides additional crew space and also a better slope to the hull front armor, which is especially important in preventing penetration of armor-piercing shells. If no option is possible for the choice of motor, our design also allows the installation of the Maybach [HL 210] motor. However, in basic principle, only our MB 507 and MB 503 motors will be proposed.” Genreally more info in the nice Tank encyclopedia Article.

The Guns: 7,5 cm KwK 42 L/70 (with early round muzzle brake, 2x Mg 34



7,5 cm KwK 42 L/70
Pictures:(Click to show)

(Note here stuck in recoil)


image|1000x666


The 7,5 cm KwK and Pak 42 L/70 was a further development upon the 7,5 cm Flak L/60, which was developed into the legendary 8,8 cm Flak 18 L/56. The 7,5 cm Flak L/60 as is was seen as not powerfull enove for the Flakrole and it was decided to increase the diameter to 88mm, however with a velocity of 860m/s it was allready seen as powerfull in a different category, for anti tank. As such it was late or planned to mount it into the Tiger I H2, however with even further improved performance by lengthening the barrle to L/70. It was used on the Panther, Panzer IV/70 (A) and (V) as well as on a Prototype for 360° Fire on a Sd.Kfz.251 Ausf.B Teilgepanzert. It was an incedibly powerfull gun for its calliber and used as basis for 75/76mm guns after the war for example the french SA 50.

Caliber: 75mm

Ammo: 75x640mmR

image

Fire Rate: 15 rpm

Single Shot, Vertical Breechblock

Muzzle velocity: 700 - 1120m/s

Weight: 1000 kg

Mounting: Main Tank gun

Ammo Types: Apcbc, Apcr, He


Ap:


Pzgr.39/42 (Apcbc) 6,8 kg 17g Np.10 (28,9g) 935m/s 192mm/10m

image
image


Pzgr.40/42 (Apcr) 4,75 kg 28x121mm 1,12kg Core 1120m/s 258mm/10m

image
image


He:


Sprgr.42 (He (No Tracer)) 5,74 kg 725g Fp.02 und Np.10 (928g TnTa) 700m/s

Historic Penetration 72/10m and 61mm/500m
(Couldnt find the correct picture, however its simply a Sprgr. 34 with a 2nd driving band)
image
image
image
image



The Vehicle:
Dimensions: 9,015 m / 3,28 m / 2,69 m
Weight: 35 ton
Armor: 16-80mm
Front 60mm/55°, side 40mm, back 50mm
Turret front 80mm, 45mm side and back. 30° all round
Speed: 56 km/h
Engine: Multiple prototypes (?) with either MB 507 Diesel, MB 503 Benzin or Hl 210.

Source:

Panzerkampfwagen V Panther AFV Profile 10, P, Chamberlain
Germany’s Panther Tank – The Quest for Combat Supremacy T. L. Jentz
Geschossringbuch I
Panzerkampfwagen Panther und Abarten W. J. Spielberger

16 Likes

WT is running out of modern stuff to slap into top tier so this kind of thing needs to pick up the slack. (its also far more interesting than another T64 or leopard)

9 Likes

Reminds me a lot of the 44m Taş from Hungary. +1

1 Like

+1

Least well researched and well written Ghostmaxi suggestion be like;
No for real though, actually amazing work on this one. The fact that some historical facts about it being built exist is fascinating.
+1

1 Like

Lol seems i wont have to work on this suggestion anymore.
+1 and great work, ghost!

I got some footage of it ill share later.

2 Likes

What is the hp/t, reverse speed and turret turn rate (even estimations would be enough)? If they are good it could be 5.7 or 6.0

1 Like

no. Not only there is no turret produced (and no info on it in the suggestion), it’s also way too similar to the t34 to not be mistaken as one at longer range in sim battles. I’d much prefer something like the front slopped panzer IV (or any weird prototypes with actual infos on them) than another VK30.02.

Lol? This thing is a goot bit bigger, has a longer gun.
Sounds like a skill/identifaction problem.
And there is info on this thing.

3 Likes

you tell me you wouldn’t misidentify it for a t34-57 at range in a misty map (or with lower resolution)? People teamkill for simply having a non regular looking vehicle they identified by default as enemy.

Man this thing is good, but it looks hell of a kind ugly. So ugly that I feel grateful how my VK 3002 looks now. Nice if we can have this foldered up with the original VK. I am really glad that Benz makes cars and not Panthers.

1 Like

And adding, it just looks like a t-34 but also reasonably different. I mean, whats the probability that this thing is going to sneak into Russian team and kills them all?

2 Likes

Just because i didnt add each and every manual and blueprint doesnt mean that there isnt enove info, not to mention the most important game play wise for the play to know are added.

And that has nothing to do with german mains, but generally new and unexperienced players, but that aint there fault that Germany is greatly played nations with many beginners conciddering the fame and history.

If you missidentify a Barn with a toilet stall on a misty day sounds like a you problem.
The 57 might be relatively long, but super thinn and the turret 41 and 42 is also small, the L/70 is long with a destinctive round muzzle brake. And neither have acupola unlike the Vk.
Its still as big as a normal Panther, thats a big you problem.

2 Likes

you didn’t add ANYTHING about the turret which is the most unique part about this behicle.

you know that if i were to play it, the problem would be my teammates, not me… i’ve been mistaken for a KV while playing a TIGER, so don’t even start on the fact they are different in shapes, because in proportion, and on the move i can already tell that it would be mistaken for a t34.

Someday, such vehicles will have to appear in the game, because you can’t indefinitely add the same tank to a different tree, or a version with different rifles on the roof.

1 Like

This isnt nothing, its enove from a basic perspective. On that a 90mm drum and a 80-100mm cast mantlet, similar to Puma mantlet.

Ok, still a you problem then, what about captured T-34, or KW? Same problem then, doesnt matter most play arcade and Realistic anyway.

And maybe they didnt do it on accident, conciddering your personality here already.

1 Like

yeah like that’s enough for gaijin to make a real vehicle out of it…

the fact that those are a problem doesn’t mean you need to add more problems, what kind of logic is that?

sure mr doesn’t accept people disagreeing and needing to attack them ad hominem because you don’t have real argument to counter.

I swear I have seen this thing in World of Tanks…

I know. Something more crazy: I heard they’re adding a maus turret+tiger ii chassis tank.

crazy!