I kinda knew what kind of answer we would get but to be honest gaslighting was not on my radar.
I could write a bunch of paragraphs explaining why about things like map bans, bigger maps (or better yet, map design), heli pve, new PERMANENT game mode, br range etc and etc have to change but its already been said. Have been said for years in fact.
The answer about amount of players on +1 BR is literally not an answer to the question. As well about map bans. As well as helicopter PvE. The answer about squadron battles is horrible.
The most appropriate response a Community Manager can give here is to either offer a further explanation of BVVD’s responses (if they have the answer and some of us do understand if you do not), or to assure players they are listening to the comments here and will take them back to either to BVVD or the dev team in general for further clarification or to revisit a stance with new information. A Youtube Comment section to one video is not the same population as your own forum. There might be some overlap sure, but best to not assume they are the same people.
If you don’t like bad assumptions on player takeaways from the video, do not insinuate an equally bad assumption that players didn’t watch it.
lmfao the response at 18:37 is jure pure ignorance and to be honest pure lack of understanding of the BIGGER ISSUE.
So explain to me how MI28 with DIRCM sitting in multipath attitude is somehow “balanced” or justified when SLM/IR guided systems cannot engage it because over performing DIRCM, it often sits tree top level avoiding SAMs with ARH missiles that love to just nose dive into the ground because hey look gaijin cant give rotatory blades proper radar cross sections (which is funny af tbh)
Oh while giving them LMURs to dump out by constantly sitting at helipad re-arming every 2/3 minutes and having some insane firing angles that they almost always result in a 1 hit because top down approach on MBTs with shocker… not ERA on the top.
That Q&A is legit the worst thing ive listened too
At some point in the future, its possible a Revenge class may indeed appear in the British Naval tree. But its too soon to mention specifics at this stage.
Our intention is not to have ships be too similar, or directly identical across multiple trees. Whereas the answer here was referring to vehicles that are directly identical. No sister ship of Arkhangelsk/ HMS Royal Sovereign is going to be identical, and as mentioned above, we prefer ships to have at least some differences. So our focus has been on other unique ships for the British tree currently. But a Revenge class remains possible for the future, simply it was not the contextual focal point of the question you are referring too (which was on tanks like M44, M55, not capital ships).
@Smin1080p_WT Can we get a better response on FnF munitions namely LMURs and Helis re-arming with almost constant immunity. that response simply is not good enough to the issues at top tier and blatantly ignores MANY issues
Naturally we are always keeping the flow of information going back to the developers from reactions to feedback on all subjects. However the answers provided were the most detailed and comprehensive that can be given, directly from BVV himself.
Unfortunately we cannot keep posting a Q&A of a Q&A around and around again with follow ups to the same question over and over again when the main factor has already been answered in full detail. Of course if there are separate questions that are largely expressed in the community that may be on other aspects not already answered, then they could of course be possible for future Q&As or news subjects.
Genuinely, have you ever played helicopters? Sitting at 60 meters will give below trees altitude, at which you can’t fire at anything. Anything higher - instant ASTER to the face.
Non-responses. 1200 GE for 20 players for 2 months of non-stop grind is a good reward. Schizophrenia about 32 map bans. Personal opinion of game designers about balance of vehicles mixed with stats.
I said before go watch replays and videos of the mi28 issue, I’m not arguing about something that is a problem and is provable by multiple videos and from multiple people of varying experiences
I have asked you if you ever played on helis at that tier. Instead of properly answering, you start whining and asking me to waste time on replay check. And when I bother to check your stats, I see that you are Z-19E player, with zero FnF helicopters purchased.
Yeah, it’s provable by my experience from mi-28nm in sb, where I took off, and the moment I took off I died to ASTER.
Dude, at least half of the BR suggestions I see on BR change topics are biased and unfair.
@ItsOnyy
If you’re only now finding out tank games are all going to be shooters with tanks, that is a jarring realization when you don’t go into it from the start.
It’s always been this way for all tank games. Whether we agree it should be this way is irrelevant.
I can agree, and this problem would get worse with more map bans. 60 map bans wouldn’t be your banned maps statistically speaking. All you’d get are small city maps if that’s what the greater good wants.
Good overall Q&A IMO. Good clarifications, especially on the fact up to 32 players in a match have maps banned impacting my ability to get Pradesh, Red Desert, etc.
If more people got multiple map bans, I’d never get large maps in War Thunder ever again by that math.
Regen steering rework occurring is a net positive.
Glad to see multiple new modes get worked on.
HARMs coming in next year to make CAS stronger. Alright.
Addressing the fact they bring unique vehicles to the game constantly, wish more people accepted that fact.