It’s a cycle.
Ignore mode > less people play it >mode gets ignored because no one plays it > repeat.
The same thing happened with heli PvP, and fixing that would not have required a ton of effort.
14 Likes
I was expecting the real answers to a real problems we have in game currently, but what we get:
“When will we finally get the ability to ban more than one map?”
No.
I just leave no comments here…
“Is there is something planned to improve the plaer experiene of Helicopter PVE game mode?”
“Niche game mode.” We don’t have any active or in progress plans for it’s additional development right now.
The state of this mode is awful and barely playable long enough already. SPAA’s spawning beneath you, vehicles driving under the ground level, vehicle spawns are extremely inconsistent etc. And there is still only 2 “tiers” available: 8.7-9.3 and 9.7-11.0 which forces helicopters like BO-105 to play alongside top tier helicopters that are wiping the whole map.
13 Likes
WHITE ROCK FORTRESS RAHHHH FINALLY!
I’ve waited so long for this
6 Likes
Yep, its happening with Air Sim. They wont update it, let alone a new map, less people play it, therefore they wont update it. I have basically stopped playing the gamemode I actually prefer in War Thunder because im just bored of it, and as a result, im barely playing WT full stop
14 Likes
In my opinion, every major update should introduce one high-rank and one medium-rank vehicle for each nation. This is because the medium-rank vehicles have been neglected, and he claims that there are approximately 40 World War II vehicles per year. However, these 40 vehicles include half of the nations’ copies of the M44, 55, a variety of vehicles that do not require premium, and so on. This is a specific issue.
10 Likes
It’s better to not get a vehicle at all than it is to get a copy paste in my opinion.
1 Like
It’s like they never actually gauged in the real opinion of top tier players, “the playerbase” is not just M1 clickbaits and T-80UEs. Just ask anyone here or even big Youtubers that will tell you the same, small maps straight up suck for top tier.
3 Likes
20 questions except we deny everything and top it off by re-using an old map as fan service.
Not sure if this was worth the wait 🤔
28 Likes
I see a lot of people wanting more ww2 content and even ww1 and their answers is to add more of those vehicles sporadically and occasionally here and there, or 1 time events? Idk man, this kinda feels like ignoring one big part of your player base.
25 Likes
“Everything is your fault, bombers are being tweaked and white rock is coming back”
Is that basically it?
Also the reply to the copy paste question is abhorrent, if that were the case, where is the UK revenge class for example?
28 Likes
Real, they just basically said “no” to everything and announced White Rock Fortress is coming back, this had to be the worst Q&A they’ve ever made.
16 Likes
I found the answers quite satisfactory regarding what is being considered in the Gaijin; at least the bombers will have increased survivability now. But we really need big maps in top tier
1 Like
We don’t do anything - players don’t like it - we don’t do anything because players don’t like it.
That’s so gaijin.
34 Likes
People love world war 2… but they refuse to do more of that! xd
5 Likes
Their response regarding top tier battles and maps was extremely disappointing and depressing to say the least. Big maps only work in top tier because MBTs and light vehicles are faster and more featured than at lower ranks, they can’t even be arsed to make an option to opt into larger maps, I don’t care if I have to wait for longer in the matchmaker, playing city maps 24/7 is exhausting.
5 Likes
Lol, nobody plays it, so we don’t make any improvements, that way nobody will play it. Easy. And what about the most played modes? No improvements there either, since they’re the most played, why bother doing anything?
Do they even play the game sometimes?
8 Likes
A CM disclosure, Dev Blog, and QnA, all in the same day?
What a great day today was! I’m going to watch now.
The news of a new Aerial Warfare mode is fantastic. Any idea on timeframe yet?
1 Like
Paper sheet answers:
A) Players are at fault
B) Sometimes we’re at fault
C) We can’t do anything about that
D) Players are at fault
32 Likes
Larger maps would solve almost all of GRB’s problems, especially those from 10.0 and above. It would be better for SPAA to do its job against helicopters and CAS. Certain types of tanks could go to different locations where they are better suited. The gameplay would be freer and better; you wouldn’t have to be stuck somewhere, and you wouldn’t have your BUK destroyed because some bastard is seeing the tip of your launcher from the other side of the map. We need more maps like Fulda, Eastern Europe, Poland, etc., but the rest of your answers were satisfactory. I see people complaining about the helicopter mode. Well, even before FnF, this mode was never famous, and we have more things to review than that. The helicopter mode works too well for grinding helicopters because you just hover and fire your missiles; you don’t need to worry about anything. As for Air RB, it’s much easier to fix: larger maps, nerf to multipath, maps more similar to the Pyrenees, and reviewing the FM of some planes, fixing the broken TVC. And modeling correctly, and fixing the radars, in short, in GRB we need bigger maps, that’s the only thing that disappointed me, the rest was satisfactory, they really listened to us about players who leave after a death and don’t have other vehicles.
Edit: @Morvran will be happy in December, something big is coming to the UK, but I’m too lazy to play with my Challenger 2, I’ll continue playing Air RB until next year, i’ve been out of GRB for a month.
5 Likes