its a 500kg bomb not a 1000kg notice I said 1000lb on bomb
this isn’t limited to top tier either
And its not only russia that is a “buggy mess”
and the real reason why the nato 1000lb didn’t kill is because its a gbu and they are buggy this happened to a LEO aswell
You should have tested both of those bombs against the same target.ERAs can do magic sometimes in warthunder.
its realy because the GBU is super buggy
you can use a 1 second fuse.That usually solves the problem
typing that in general chat did get me a 30 day chat ban so :(
One country comes to mind that did worse.
Remind me, who traded a world tier arms dealer for some tranny
Yes, I am indeed right about M829A2 being able to penetrate T-80U UFP up to a km range, DM53 on Leo2A5 manages to go through until 700m, DM53 on Leo2A6 can penetrate it up to 1,8
km.
(ignore the penetration map)
I see this topic is a s*it show as usual.
Try that in a real match.Result of penetration analysis is often different in real match.
That applies to every vehicle.
Yes.
I was actually going through some bug reports and found one regarding Object 279, I had to translate it from Russian, It was about a “weak spot” at the rear of the tank which could be penned by an APDS round from an Israeli Sho’t. To make a long story short, the dev team replied to the OP of the report within 1 day and the issue was marked Resolved. Report “bug”, have “bug” dealt with in 24 hours or less.
Sorry, but i will have to stop you right here. 27 is the only short rod top tier round (less spall, worse fight characteristics and other things in these screens
)
Which is why i made the suggestion to add more detailed penetration analysis right in the replay, though it never got to be even released on english forum, while it didnt need verification on rus. forum, it got with votes and was passed to devs, hopefully it ends up in game.
L27A1 is a long rod penetrator and does as much damage as anything else what are you talking about
Iirc 27 is around 650, while other rounds are > 700. Correct me if im wrong, but that is a short rod. Unless i remember wrong. Then it is my mistake
That animation of the rod going into the armor is crazy to see how much energy the armor absorbs.
Ill bet if a rod bounced that the tank even wiggled or the sound in tank was pretty loud
Alright, as I expected, you’re aiming from above.
Well then, I can disregard this.
I am aiming on same level as the cannon is. Aiming higher at UFP doesnt change much, it sure struggles
slightly more but it is still pennable. Dont know whats with your logic here. One tank being pennable (which is both in irl and in game) by some rounds wont change much about the whole topic lol.