Though I think there might be a few outstanding bug reports for the Warrior Milan that would probably be a better use of time.
My thoughts were revolving around the amount of fully stabilized autocannons around 8.3, and how if the warrior was moved down it would face less things stabilized total, while still only being able to pen things from the side with the Rarden, but anywhere with the MILAN
Warrior is fine where it is. I just don’t use it much because the Falcon and ZT3A2 exist.
Yeaaaa the Warrior is fine, I just use the Scimitar instead cause I like it
2 Likes
Flacon is rly that good?
I saw its very slow so how is the stock grind of it?
I just unlocked it but didnt played it yet
Yeah, I love it. It’s not a fast flanker like ZA-35, use it as a small sneaky boi, hiding in places where the enemy don’t suspect it. Make your way to the right spot and you can control the map.
Benefit of the Falcon is a constant belt with 1 APDS per every four rounds, and with a lot of the enemies you face, you won’t even need that APDS round to kill them. Especially the likes of Turms III and others. Anyway, it’s obviously not like Gepard and others where you spray your APDS and then have to drop an ammo box to get more. I like having the more diluted full belt that you can just spray and spray. Only downside of the small size is that it doesn’t really survive hits like you can the others. The crew are really crammed in there.
1 Like
But the apds is on tier 4
Like how is the stock grind?
Cuz im not rly gonna come back to it after i spade it
its alright, it has aphe in its belts
its not a vehicle you should drop after spading though
1 Like
Why would you drop after spading? It’ll be in your lineup upwards of 10.0. Badger is no good, and Falcon is better than ZA-35 on CQB maps (where sneak is better than simply fast flank and spank). It’s also a fun lineup in general. Falcon, ZT3A2, Vickers Mk.3, Oli Mk1, etc. One of those you just play to have fun.
The falcon might be the single strongest anti-tank vehicle Britain has in the entire TT.
Stock grinds are designed to always suck
Im planning on the za 35 cuz i love flanking with high risk high reward
I just dont see myself coming back to this br unless maybe i play with someone
1 Like
AA vehicles in that Br range are all broken and overpowered. Its not exclusive to the falcon. the XM246 is probably worse than Falcon simply because it can tank shots and never seems to die and it has a radar.
1 Like
What is this mode where you kill 180 to win instead of 60?
heh, no idea why it says 180 there. Wonder if it’s a replay oddity.
1 Like
F-4EJ is overlooked. It sucked ahh when it faced Tomcats and F-16s 24/7, and it still does so against MiG-23ML, and I barely understood SARH functionality when I got it for the first time, but oh boy the amount of dopamine you get from taking out them J-7Ds et al. from the stratosphere with AIM-7Es when you actually master their usage
I was wondering that 2 then I saw it was a multi cap not a precapped map
The T-34 “taran” is bad at 6.3. It fights heavies 24/7 that it can’t pen reliably frontally. And it’s crazy to think that the m4a2 has similar capabilities as taran, but is lower in br.
1 Like
The horror of medium tank not being able to front pen a heavy.
1 Like
Dont know if this counts or not but china and japan shouldn’t get missiles on a foreign helicopter that cant operate them…
Yup, it’s a true horror to play on city maps. Especially when there’s a horde of heavies that are all around the map.