All you have to do is look at the people replying to you, see what nation they main ~ Russia ~ and know that nothing you type is going to get through to them. They are a special bunch.
What are you talking about? The Abrams was a Tank designed to Go head to head with Soviet armor, and out flank them and keep going and taking more and more ground. U.S Armored warfare has never been to just sit and wait. The FCS on even the Abrams has always been superior to anything the Soviets or Russians have ever made, and we knew this, they still have yet to figure out how to make a battle worthy vehicle that can even depress a hill or go in reverse when needed.
Of the many years of reading posts on the Internet about the Abrams, the amount of lies and wrong information from people who generally have no clue what they are referring to has never stopped shocking me.
Please stop typing things like saying it was made to be hull down, you are referring to the Brits and the Germans. The Abrams in this game are not up to U.S Army production standards, and they certainly can’t be used the way they were designed, gaijin has gone out of their way to make sure they are incapable of doing that.
dayum
wait
DAYUM 113 MILLIONS SL?
BRO
AH HELL NAH
AH HELL NAH
What? USA has unkillable OP CAS, it has meta tanks, and its SPAA is sub-par and not the worst.
Win rate does not determine vehicle capability.
2 Likes
Im sorry unkillable OP cas? Are you on drugs?
Decent Cas but no where near as good as the Su34 and Su30.
It is considerably worse than the Vt1 slingers and pantsirs hence why people see it as one of the worst. Though it’s much better than the OTO, type 81 and maybe even the TOR/HQ (depends on preference).
1 Like
9 Likes
The F-15E has an extremely favourable matchup vs everything in the game that isn’t a Eurofighter.
You can kill 2A7 frontally with same Bushmaster aswell btw,ZTZ99A can be .50 called from front and T-90M/BVM can also be killed easily through front with the Bushmaster.
The Abrams is top three best tanks in the game. Want to know why so many think it is bad? Because they refuse to play it properly. The Abrams was not designed to be thrown into battle against 16 other tanks firing at it. It was designed for a support role.
There’s a reason why Leopards and Challengers sit in the back: they were designed to snipe.
There’s a reason why T-Series tanks are shorter and sloped: they were designed for flat terrain and CQC.
There’s a reason why Japanese and Chinese tanks are so fast: they were designed for flanks and ambushes.
Want proof of what the Abrams is? Take a look at the doctrine of the US forces. What did they do back in the 90s? That’s right, they let their air force swoop in and take care of the majority of the opposing ground forces. The Abrams only had to fight a few stragglers that were not carpet bombed.
What did the Abrams do in Afghanistan? They were rarely in any tank battles. Why? Because the US Air Force took care of the Afghan tanks, so the US tanks played a support role.
What did the Abrams do in Syria? Support role.
What did the Abrams do literally anywhere? They were used in a support role.
What do level 9 players that just bought the Click-Bait do? They rush into the battle, guns blazing, and then cry because everyone knows the weak spot of the most common 11.7 vehicle.
I can’t tell if you’re serious.
3 Likes
I’d say it’s more daft to assume that Japanese and Chinese tanks are particularly nimble compared to things like the Abrams and Leopard (they aren’t) or that Russian tanks are designed for CQC (Grozny says привет). Every tank is designed to be the best it can possibly be, in every possible way, while accounting for manufacturing costs and local engineering capabilities. Reducing this to obnoxious specializations is infantile.
Bruh adats cant kill anything that manouvering judt s little. JUST CUZ U CANT SEE THIS DAMN MISSILE
1 Like
If the Soviets were to have invaded the Fulda Gap, the Abrams stationed there were ordered to hold them off for as long as they could. Sounds like defense right? It had great mobility for repositioning and the turret armor was made to be resistant to projectiles fielded at the time. Sure in the long run they probably would have been offensive, but the tank does extremely well in a hull down position.
Except that’s what they are. Different doctrines require different strategies. Unless you really believe the Type 10 can brawl, especially with zero armour. Or that the T-90M can snipe with it’s no gun depression. Or he’ll, the Leopard can brawl, despite the massive disadvantage of a massive power pack.
Yeah, it’s a real shitty change.
So people can see it in action :
I removed it from my uk lineup sadly.
1 Like
The people thinking F-15E isn’t OP are indirectly implying Su-30SM isn’t OP.
No they aren’t…
There are completely on two different levels of effectiveness. To say that they are equally OP is being disengenous.
What makes thr F15 op is soley because of its gbu39 paired with the mavericks. Its what makes the mavericks barely usable at medium-long range instead of it being useless
1 Like
The heck are you getting this from? The M1 series has, for a very long time, a middle of the road elevation and traverse speed, its always been worse than the high end T series tanks and the leopards.
EG all M1s spin at max 34 degrees per second and elevate at 19.2 degrees per second without crew mods.
Meanwhile every single leopard since the 2A4 spins at 34 degrees per second and elevates at 32 degrees per second.
The leclercs are at 34 and 32.
The BVM is 34 and 32.
The T-90M is 34 and 32.
Heck you have to go to 11.0 before any Russian tank gets bad gun handling.
The tank most equivalent to the M1 series gun handling is the Ariete at 34 and 16 respectively.
Ditto to everything above since thats gun handling.
Is literally equal bar having 1 degree more gun depression compared to the leopards and ariete, the Challanger has the same but I doubt anyone is saying that tank is fantastic.
Man you really have no idea what you are talking about, 4x to 12x is vastly superior in game, the Type 10s have the best optics at 4x to 13.3x.
I’m not even going to address the remaining drivel here since its just myths stacked on myths.
As a fighter. Nothing in the game still compares to the KH-38MT, its not even remotely a contest.
Both the Eurofighter and F-15E are not close to unkillable CAS currently, that crown goes to the SU-30SM and SU-34 and nothing will top them until air launched cruise missiles are added or the KH-38MT is removed from the game like it should be.
I’m sorry I have an aced crew in my M1A1? Also only the early variants have the 3-10x optics. The newer ones get the 3-13x optics. None of what I said was a myth it’s purely from my perspective as an opinion. There’s no need to be so hostile over someone’s opinion.