2 of the 4 one death leavers were premiums.
And of the 2 death leavers, all were tech tree.
I was in a match as USA on Mozdok the other day and they just didn’t play the map as well as the enemy, simple.
That’s not even a simple, that’s repeatable. So mix the US like you do USSR, or make the whole Realistic game like Arcade and allow all nations to join.
Gaijin now has enough players to do that and they state things should be balanced enough, right? So mix up the nations and stop making it historical basis of who would have fought who.
If you’re not up to fix the models, at least make the game bearable for the players.
Same tech tree on both teams battles aren’t a toggle, they’re available for all tech trees at all times and it activates sometime between 1 minute and 5 minutes.
Enough people have to be queuing for USA to cause it to trigger.
Then they need to lower the toggle number, don’t they, because I was dropping with a mix team including US a couple nights ago and it took up to 6 minutes to find a battle.
As a person who has a teacher in collage that showed the class blueprints of the M1A2 Abrams, from when he worked on designing the Armor. I can confidently state that the Armor is way- under represented. ALSO, the turret ring area is ment to shatter APFSDS rounds but gijin doesnt have that mechanic.
i am with you here, they shouldn’t match other nations together with US anymore so they don’t drag them down with their skill issue.
My biggest problem grinding israel now is getting matched with the US 24/7.
entitled americans still crying? I guess you dont cry when you are paired with germany or cccp to auto win anything at br+10
1 Like
Damn guys close the thread.
This random guy mentioning a unknown teacher from who knows which college citing a nameless paper is saying the Abrams is underperforming.
You guys would be taken more seriously if you toned down with the “trust me bro” schizoposting.
3 Likes
Keep showing more and more hatred towards US, Good Job.
Would a random guy mentioning a unknown teacher from who knows which college citing a nameless paper is saying the Abrams is over performing be acceptable?
No.
Next question.
3 Likes
I dont even really care about the rest of this thread, my main complaint has to be the turret neck, spall liners being a pretty unfair addition, and F-15/F-16 with all AA loadout being super expensive while other AA options are just suboptimal.
1 Like
What about a mentioning a unknown teacher from who knows which college citing a nameless paper saying the Abrams did well against Swedish forces it fought in a battle in 50s America? Does that sound more like this game?
And here it is, the mentioned schizoposting.
I think the joke is going over your head lol
1 Like
Yeah, it could be.
Nah, it definitely is. Sweden fighting the US on US soil in the 1950s? and the Abrams is involved? If you read that, im not even sure how you took that seriously whatsoever.
1 Like
No no, it could be that the joke went over my head. And it did.
Don’t worry.The forum is desperately in need of more humourless people.
Thanks. Happy to feel welcome.
1 Like