USA needs AGM-154C with IR not the GNSS version!

Maybe agm158c, iir, gps, and iog. 534kg warhead, and a type of engine on the back. With 500km range. Terrain following and very low rcs. (Probably not, but would be cool)

Reason why i thought so was cause of the black one. The agm158 looks alot like a agm154


2 Likes

Gib Stormshadow plox
Britain suffering this update.

1 Like

yes, me tornado with 4 scalp please

Who said that though? It can, just that it’s up in the air so far if it can even differentiate between different tanks

AviationIR

Recent DEV update added the AGM-84H :

What is appropriate source material for historical issues?

  • OEM Manuals (primary source): User manuals, repair manuals, factory manuals, operating manuals, technical manuals etc. Single source is required (preferred source).
  • Authored works (secondary source): Reference books on collections of vehicles/aircraft/ships (‘coffee table books’), biographies, specialist books, “expert” opinion publications, industry magazines etc. At least two unrelated sources required.

Please be reminded that Wikipedia or other private websites are not considered reliable sources.

You need to provide the following information about the source:

  • Title and if applicable: publication date, document number, ISBN.
  • Author or organisation
  • Image of the cover
  • Images of all the referenced pages and their page numbers
  • References for photographs

There. Fixed it for you :)

2 Likes

Luckily I can count the number of times I’ve been hit with that just on one hand, so not something that happens frequently :))

1 Like

not gonna be enough its not gonna make any difference id rather have more glide bombs than some missiles that cant saturate an spaa radar
\

They take their sweet time to do that stuff when there is no pressing need, all the guidance stuff was surely made or at least finalized

This reads like it cannot track anything in real-time, it receives a thermal image from the main targeting pod, then it is fed to the Hammer’s built-in memory, and then it compares that image with the one in the seeker’s view during its terminal approach. It cannot track or follow targets on its own without Datalink, at least that’s my interpretation.

It will still make at least one collision course correction(to zero out GPS error), so it should be able to hit a moving target as long as it maintains Speed and Course, over the terminal phase.

1 Like

Gunjob covered it in this post. Only thing missing from his post is that once it starts looking at a location, it can find targets atleast 300m from the center of the target location.

a lot of stuff in the game are suppose to only target ships

From the looks of the models I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s JSOW-C, has a similar design and the little optic in the center. maybe it’s just gaijinsm models again though.

KEPB-350, Stormshadow/SCALP, BK90 (let me cope), Kh-59M (for Su-30SM/SM2 and 34, dunno why that hasn’t happened yet tbf…), maybe JASSM because why not atp.

1 Like

Add JASSM instead

1 Like

Just because its not meant to doesn’t mean it can’t. AGM-62 Walleye was meant to hit bridges and buildings but can also do tanks no problem

Well it’s more to say that it can’t really track moving ground targets according to official information.

Because of the way the Walleye works, it finds edges not centroids. So doesn’t care what the target is past a point.

There’s footage of one hitting a B-17 and it ends up targeting the edge of one of the blades of the prop.

2 Likes