Usa mig 29s when?

The swedish got vehicles they only tested and there are plenty of captured vehicles in all the trees, so no, you dont get a carveout for the Mig 29 when the British just got a SepV3.

the Australians got a SepV3

it dosent have the british flag

1 Like

It all reminds me of massive IRIAF gatekeeping wave “Muh US airframe should stay in US tech tree”

man imagine how many “F-14 IRIAF is russian bias” threads there would have been if it was added exactly like it was but to the russian tech tree

1 Like

Tested vs In Service. Again.

And quite frankly, they shouldn’t have.

By this standard sure, the U.S. Can have a MiG-29.

But Russia also gets a Leo 2 and Abrams.

I mean, US mains got pissy because US airframe in US tech tree but under different flag is better than same US airframe in US tech tree under US flag, so….

I could keep going. To be clear, i am not a fan of the leopard bread lines.

yeah they should start with a serbian rafale and keep going with polish F-16s

Poland is in British tech tree unfortunately. But I won’t say no to Serbian Rafale, will save me a lot of time playing Fr*nch

No it isn’t? Poland only has 2 vehicles in the British tech tree

2 Likes

We need independent Polish TT.

2 Likes

someone felt a disturbance in the force

3 Likes

I just got back from the city and I see this 😭

2 Likes

Anytime Poland is mentioned in WT he is summoned.

2 Likes

Poland is everywhere, but I don’t think majority of poles would like it as a USSR subtree. On the other hand gaijin loves controversies.

1 Like

not too sure about that one
bc if they did they would have already added a certain country to the russian tree

1 Like

Time for a Ukrainian US sub-tree!

You said it’s in Britain and now it’s everywhere? Well the second part is right tbh

That certain country doesn’t have a lot to offer that USSR doesn’t have already.