R-24T is not hitting an A-10C unless MAWS is turned off.
3 Likes
Depends on aspect
If launch from top - MAW wont triggered on 24T
Not with that garbage radar/RWR it cant (Go up in br)
2 Likes
I know how bad is MiG-23 canopy. Its my most played Soviet plane in sim. But this one negative is negligible compared to the number of positives which this plane has. +idk why you should lock enemy plane by MiG-23. There is absolutely no need. With radar you will only find target and than you use only IRST together with R-24T.
Use R-24T and SPO-15 is very good.
I’m not saying it’s bad in sim, I’m just saying I think it’s better in RB than in sim because of those reasons.
Also the reason you’d use the Radar is to use the R24R and to find people. R24T is visible and easily flared
1 Like
R-24T is definitely not easy visible in sim. It have only 3 seconds burn time and launched from 5-8 km is almost impossible to notice. R-24R I almost never used. Maybe thats why I have more than 3:1 KD in MLD.
Saying SPO-15 is good is laughable. No. It isn’t. MiG-23 is fine at current BR.
4 Likes
Compared to some other RWRs on that BR it is good RWR. MLD is too low.
Like what
For example AN/ALR-45(V).
AN/ALR-45(V) is about as bad and the F-14 is a far better jet than the MLD overall…
1 Like
Bro. Have you ever played with F-14? I would say not. Otherwise you wouldn’t have written such an obvious falsehood.
The A-10 also has a very noticeable lack of thrust meaning it has 0 climb or acceleration.
Unfortunately I don’t play attackers outside of CAS in ground.
Did you not read? You quoted it too. You thought that airspeed doesn’t matter for missile range for some reason, then I corrected you. That’s off topic? The whole entire thing was in response to you not understanding basic physics.
Then I mentioned the A-10 in RB because you said “Thank you for the info. You’ve also just proven indeed the Su-39, and Su25T / SM3 are in a far worse position than I have feared” to give insight that the A-10 is slower than the Su-25 and it massively affects its missile’s range negatively hence why I believe in ARB it would be fine to move up to 11.7 but not 12.0.
What is false?
You do realize that applies to every plane that has an IR guided aam right ?
So you’ve just listed anything from 9.0-13.3 for aircraft, from every nation.
Care to test that theory?
For all all-aspect IR guided AAM.
Do a test of them both then for the clas why don’t you.
Su-39 at 600 mph
A-10C at 400 mph
Max speed for both, we will see how terrible a difference there is
[quote=“Axzuel, post:638, topic:155665, full:true”]
The A-10 also has a very noticeable lack of thrust meaning it has 0 climb or acceleration.
Unfortunately I don’t play attackers outside of CAS in ground.
I’ve been talking about sim the whole time.
Lack of thrust? Seems to fly just fine unless your carrying a full load
“Unfortunately I don’t play attackers outside of CAS in ground.“ @Axzuel
You just outted yourself, you have no experience in how these operate in Air SIM. Unless you care to add something is regards to AIR SIM. I suggest you leave.
And lastly, air sim definitely plays differently than Air RB.
1 Like
So Aim-9L, Python, etc carrying planes all need to be nerfed now because you can’t be bothered to check your soundings?