Send a gif of the seeker head from the moment of that photo, for the next 3-5 secs.
According to your logic, wouldn’t a big flare dump with engines off be more effective than continued flare popping?
And yes that’s why we are talking about sim, since as the other guy said, sim is the last good place for strike aircraft.
Ah I see. I just screen recorded since Xbox series X can take a 4k 1 min re-wind clip.
Kinda bummed. Wanted to see what actually went wrong with that r-73, and I’d pull the logs, but I doubt I can do that on Xbox.
I can say though, it only crashes for me when I select a player to view.
Fast forwarding too fast can also cause crashes. Which is a problem with how much you have to fast forward through in Sim replays
Right haha.
Dropping flares periodically and not spamming flares would be more effective against the R-73 yes. It hardly matters if the F-15 had AB on or off in that situation because the FOV is already locked in.
Btw the R-73 being 4.5deg FOV after it reacquires lock is a replay bug, its 0.75deg FOV the moment it locks on. If it wasn’t then it would’ve gone for flares because the R-73 is more sensitive to flares than something like a 9L.
Oh wow look it’s some actual stats on why the A-10C is unfair
That’s an insane KPB
No question A10 is over preforming. Made great use of the HMD which it shouldn’t be able to slave.
That being said the 1 9M didn’t look like the seeker was turning off which makes me wonder if the 9Ms need a bug report aswell.
People will say sim is different … and it is, it’s even better, because the IFF ;)
IFF, and smokeless aams that nobody can see
Yup, pretty much what I’ve said over and over. A-10C breaks the whole 11.3 bracket, 11.7 bracket… poor 10.7 & 10.3 bracket
Btw who’s the YouTuber?
This is sim. Dont play 10.3 or 10.7 aircraft in full uptiers then.
I dont play the Sea Harrier FRS1e (10.7) because its DOA vs the Mig-23ML (11.7)
(Heck the Sea Harrier FRS1 (11.3) is DOA vs the Mig-23ML (11.7) at the moment)
(edit: Mig-23ML finally has the correct BR, missed that but point still somewhat stands )
Sim or RB there’s always someone playing a full down tiered plane, because they need to grind it.
At this point, what do you actually have to argue? Speed? And speed alone? It’s only 200 mph slower than its counter part, at a lower br currently than its counter part.
Grind another thing, or suffer XD
It is faster to grind new vehicles via the spade bonus you get than it is just pure grinding I find.
Depends on how good that vehicle is.
A-10C should be 11.7 .it should be the same BR as the Su-39s. On balance, its equal in most respects. But using the argument “my poor 10.3 is going to suffer” in a gamemode where uptiers are purely optional. Is just a bad argument.
RB is different, and i barely play RB so im not really going to comment on its placement within that gamemode. But I think if anything, its worse in RB than SB notably and 11.7 would be pushing it a bit (BUT… +/- 1 BRs do need to be considered and for that reason alone, it should be a higher BR in RB as well. Likely 11.7, though so should the Su-25BM)
10% extra if you die a lot, it’s not worth it, you have less RP at the end
When grinding the Sea Harrier FA2 (13.0) I went back and spaded a number of aircraft I previously didnt finish spading such as the Javelin (8.3), Jaguar IS (11.0) and Buc S2B (10.3) (BRs from before decompress)
Unless you are telling me that the soviets have no aircraft lower than 10.3 and thus are always forced to play uptier. There is always something else you could play.
Did you watch the video that guy posted? He went uncontested the whole time. 12.0 is a well balanced Br for that plane, because, if not, HUNDREDS of planes need buffs, which is unnecessary, the A-10C itself is the problem.
The Su-39 is still worse than the A-10C, at a higher br, try to not be biased in the comment your going to post after this.
What’s good in what plane, su-39 vs. a-10c
Su-39: speed, ircm (kinda useless unless something doesn’t have all aspect ir aams), radar (but no R-77 to use the radar), x192 cms. Better plane construction.
A-10C: turn speed, better visibility, energy retention, ammo count, armament count, thermal, IFF HMD (which is better than the radar the Su-39 has as it doesn’t ping enemy rwr, x480 Cms, Aim-9M (and 4 of them, not 2), bigger bombs, MAW, better pilot armor.
I’m sure I’m missing some on the A-10C, but HOW IN YOUR MIND, CAN THESE BE THE SAME BR??
Christ the Su-25SM3 is a 12.3 with half the aams.
atp i’ve given up on gaijin to implement proper br’s
we just have to deal the cards we are dealt with