very funny how it sits at the same BR as the premium AMX that gets only 2 AAM and no air-ground missiles
1 Like
Abrams is dogshit, period.
So still bias, let A10C to deal with Panstier, while SU39/25T still at 11.3, only need to deal with roland?
let a top speed can’t even reach to 800km/h to toptier is pretty “fair” What clear logic you have.
12.0? so you mean it needs a higher BR than Mirage F1 and MIG23ML? what kind of player only focus on the missiles? SU39 can use 9K121 to hunt low-speed aircraft, don’t you know how? Or you just wanna A10C to BVR? to against AIM7F or magic2?look at GR7, Use your brain to think about that is bias or not.
2 Likes
It’s more than playable right now, other than it being blind against SPAA’s it’s pretty good if you only use ATGMs.
Su39/25T are not apt comparisons to the A10C.
They don’t have HMD, Thermals, a MAW, and have 1/3rd the countermeasures and half the defensive armament. On top of that, they also have very limited gimbal angles, thus they are flying head-on to the battlefield any time they wish to use LGMs.
These have some gimmicks, like the Vikhrs and IRCCM and a ground radar for the 39. That still doesn’t make up a 0.3BR difference.
3 Likes
A10C doesn’t belong to 12.0, 11.3 is much reasonable since it didn’t get the SNIPER pod which it would make it get 2 AGM65Gs each side.
Will probably be rmeoved from slaving IR Missiles
Minimal impact in Sim
Su-25 and Su-39 have IRCM
2 Likes
Thermals have a minimal impact in sim?
How would you begin to justify that opinion for aircraft without radars?
And yes, they do have IRCM, rear aspect IRCM. Not as useful as you’d think. MAW feeds you more information.
4 Likes
The IRCM on su-39 is wonky and doesnt work properly most of the time
2 Likes
For something like the Harrier Gr7 at 12.7. The lack of radar is felt and the Tpod can be of some limited usefulness. But when comparing the A-10C with the Su-39 (that has a radar with IFF) then its not even close. The A-10Cs Thermal Tpod will be of minimal impact.
You dont exactly struggle to find ground targets in Sim either. So in that regard its minimal value.
IRCM makes you entirely and completely immune to rear aspect shots. MAWS just warns you that something has fired something at you (but assuming its just a UV MAWS) then it will ping that something is behind youj, like a teammate firing or someone dropping flares. If anything it prvoides too much information sometimes.
1 Like
I dont recall it ever not blocking a rear-aspect IR shot for me
lol, you must be lucky
Or unlucky. Trying to deal with an Su-39 in something like the Buc S2B or Sea Harrier is a pain in the butt. Also had a mare of a time trying to take one down in the Tornado F3. Aim-9L useless in rear aspec.t Target was too low for a Skyflash and dropping Chaff whenever I lcoked radar. So there I am, at Su-39 speeds, trying to get my guns onto something that is throwing itself round hard. Was the hardest kill of my life.
I killed too many SU-39s from rear despite the weird wobbling seeker i got, it just isn’t that useful
1 Like
It can have 2 65Gs with the litening.
It can mount another 2 Gs.
In your use of it, sure.
I clutched a whole game by myself, with 2 crew and a late start, ended up getting a nuke. In the M1a1 click bait, so yeah so “dogshit”
I am fairly certain thw G can only be launched from the LAU-117
It can have it’s moments but to say you can’t do that with a BVM is reaching
A-10C can over G the pansir easily. Secondly, the only Su-25 model that is 11.3 is the Su-25Bm with no long range camera. All the rest, are 11.7. The VT1 is a very capable missile.