US top tier stuck in the 80's

Why does every country get vehicles made in 2010-2020 when the US’s best tank in game, the M1A2 Sep V2 was made in 1986? The T90M was made in the 2020? The F15E entered service in 1980’s? F16C came out in 1980’s? F15 MSIP II came out in the mid 1980’s? F14B came out in the 1990’s. These vehicles are still proven today that they are worthy of fighting, but what is going on? I am confused why the US tech tree doesn’t get it’s more modern, 2000’s vehicles, when other countries are getting them? Am I missing something? If the Su25SM3 came out in 2017, shouldn’t the US get the Raptor which came out in 2005? (EXAGERATED example) Where is the Sep v3, it became available in 2017 for the US Army. They are going to be adding the F18 soon, but the first F18 was made in 1978? Why is there such a HUGE GAP between the US tech tree and the rest of the tech trees? Is it because US weapons are far more advanced than the rest of the countries? Would it make it unfair? Will someone, especially from the Gaijin head quarters respond to this, I need answers on what the hell is going on.

Introduction dates don’t determine the order of which stuff gets added.

You get things that are balanced against what others can get. If it turns out those things are older / newer, then it is what it is.

10 Likes

When the US can stop being the most handheld air nation maybe they can get even more annoying ground vehicles, its really tiring see how many people dont know how to play US tanks and saying their garbage when theybare very fun. Literally they just dont fit your playstyle maybe try changing.

3 Likes

Another one

5 Likes

Every hour of everyday…

2 Likes

the fact that you are russian main tells everything buddy

SEP v2 early 2000’s iirc, the F-15E ingame has to be from 2000’s or 2010s but is limited in its a2a and some a2g as well as radar for balance.

same with F-15C MSIP though the thing separating it from the 80’s one ingame is the JHMCS, F-16C is from 90’s though some people consider it 2000s/2010s bc it has CCIP or something. A-10C from 2000s as well. M1128 from 2000s as well, m3a3 entered service 2000, only thing 80’s is the base airframes/chassis for some of the examples.

f22 is only one where it is a matter of it straight up just being too advanced for the game by a long shot. nearly unparalled radar, great missiles, stealth, amazing flight performance, amazing ECM and EW capabilities (crazy good RWR system), top notch sensor fusion, it will dominate ARB and will be still ok in ground.

Ok US main , time to take your meds

5 Likes

TLDR: I need US to get newer stuff cause the current stuff isn’t good enough !!!

3 Likes

It’s very much the result of Gaijin picking and choosing options to fabricate a configuration to make things at least somewhat balanced.

There are very few US jets that have access to the full suite of stores that they should for their configuration, even if we only consider those types that have been implemented, even when issues have been pointed out repeatedly (F-4E TGPs / TISEO, F-16C AIM-7, F-14A AIM-9L / IRSTS, F-15A Countermeasures, etc. ).

So for all intents and purposes most if not all airframes above 7.0 are franken-planes that include and omit various features, functions and stores to fit their BR even if it doesn’t reflect a configuration that actually existed, which is a shame since its a crapshoot to decide if we get some initial config one from later in the airframe’s service life, and they rarely go back and adjust things to better reflect the changes to the meta.

1 Like

Ayo. No plane. F-15C is from like 2005 the F-15E is also 2000’s. Tank and helis maybe

1 Like

ah64d isnt exactly new but ik that ah1z is like from 2012. theres pretty new stuff in like every tree now

1 Like

i have 3 top tier air nation and i rarely play usa but the fact that every time us gets something good some people cry about it and make it worst than irl is why this is getting out of hand "/

Technically with recent access to GBU-39’s The intended configuration dates to approximately 2021~2022 at the earliest, but is missing things like the AN/AAQ-33 and EGBUs / L-JDAM, and the variant of the AAQ-28 might be wrong, should be the -AT.

f-35-a-10-capabilities-1
f-35-a-10-capabilities-2

But here a fun fact. Everything they have is good , borderline broken even , especially when it come to their jets and plane. Gaijin doesn’t take the year when the vehicle was made or was pushed into service into consideration . And no one crying about US stuff being strong , we literally get threads after threads about how “bad” the US stuffs are, still don’t get how other “main” the one crying

1 Like

if us stuff is good and broken why you dont have usa as one of your nations? you have germany japan russia uk but no usa? i wonder why???

Cause i don’t want to play with people who are not that good. You checked my stats , you sure have seen my OES stats , 2.0 KD , 38% wr. That because Brit got put on the same team with US basically every game

2 Likes

Because 1980-90s US tech is on par with 2010-20s tech of other nations.

stop making excuses my man maybe you are just scared that if they get something good your 2.0 kd get ruined :)

Can you read ?

Also bro really gonna compare UK to US as if chally are good. US main syndrome

1 Like