Simple.
MiG-23ML is 11.7. that’s why it makes sense.
Also, as I said in the F-4E thread, I have had no issue with whopping MiG-23s. They are, in all honesty, hardly a difficult aircraft to face.
2 Likes
Im fairly certain the Q&A specifically said ARM first half of 2026. I would give a reasonably good chance of it being this March
Re-read what I said, but what would you place thats stronger anyhow?
Then I don’t see it being added. We don’t need a million Bradley’s just as we don’t need a million M60s or LAVs or other stuff. Plus, it’s hardly a worthy effort when we have multiple vehicles with similar play style already in game.
MI28NM LMUR addition more likely.
CLAWS to dampen CAS impact in June probably
CAS gap is probably the largest for the US atm
oh yeah i misread that but id say the J-7E is def the best jet at that br F-4E is like a close second
Than make it into a folderd Bradley, and i would like to see a new bradley, i don’t really get what it is with people that complain the second a new vehicle isn’t a major amazing improvement.
Doesn’t matter it’s still a nee vehicle and who doesn’t want more? Imagine if the only abrams in game was the m1 and they never added a new variant cause “there are already multiple vehicles with similar play style ingame” makes no sense if u ask me
Unfortunately, these tanks play no role on the battlefield because only a few nations play for these nations. There are three nations: the USA, the USSR, and Germany. Victory or defeat doesn’t depend on the others.
True.
J-7E is so fun.
I’ve played both very recently. J-7E struggles to have match impact often with its missiles being fully reliant on the other party not being aware of the missile being fired because it’s a 1 flare like all other non-irccm missiles. This combined with the low gun ammo count gives it low match impact unless the user is highly skilled to pull off kills with low missiles/ammo used. The F-4E on the other hand is very simple to use and has high match impact generally with 7E2s being much harder to avoid and the m61 being an extremely forgiving gun to use.
The J-7E is technically powerful and excels in 1v1s but I don’t think it’s better than the F-4E.
2 Likes
This is nonsense, purely. You’re basically saying it doesn’t matter if the USA still has better vehicles than the other 7 minor nations because less people play said minor nations.
5 Likes
Unfortunately Cas is the real determining factor for ground rb these days, without the addition of a singe MBT russias wr went from 43% in August to 54% in December
Completely different circumstances. The new variants of the Abrams were being added as the new “top dogs”- completely surpassing anything available at the time.
The Bradley is already surpassed by both the M10 Booker and HSTV-L. Even this variant. So why add it? It won’t drastically change gameplay, it won’t keep the US “on par” with new and rising challenges. It’s just another stupid Bradley. Spend the time and the effort on modelling this and move it into fixing the TOW-2s and adding vehicles that actually should be added, like the LAV-25.
Cause some people like me don’t care if another vehicle is better, we want the newest variant of a vehicle that we like, your argument makes no sense. Not everyone cares about performance
Why are you showing me the best helicopter for the UK, Japan and France?
1 Like
Wdym, its the us variant and i only play us…
It should be added because I want it. That’s your argument. It’s just as good as mine. Don’t act the part of a better sailor when we are on the same ship.
Do you often see Leclercs or Arietas in battle? I see them once a month. In the queue, I often see 1-5 players waiting for Italy or France. Meanwhile, for the USSR, the waiting list is over 50-70.
…it was a joke dude…
The 64E is great but hardly something only the US profits from so that leaves air CAS in which the US kinda sucks
2 Likes