France RB BR’s:
- AMX-13-M24: 3.7 up to 4.0, and make it Rank III.
For similar reasons as the M24.
3 Likes
and concerning the sabres being undertiered, this BR range of jets is ironically well enough balanced that moving a bunch of sabres up will just straight up break the balance and matchmaker of that region.
the sabres really are not that much of an issue at their current BRs.
Again, you are heavily underestimating Etendard’s turn performance with flap usage, and I didnt say it wins I said the F-86F-40 is not better by a giant gap of performance so you can still outfly the other guy and win.
It does. You can’t compare to undertiered aircraft. That is disingenuous.
There is no significant difference. They more or less are the same FM but with Magics on the higher BR plane. They have different engines but its more or less not changing anything.
It does matter, and I’m not really going to move forward with this conversation until we address this. Gaijin downtiered the very best (the most meta, the best) planes at 8.7-9.3, those being the F-86 variants and MiG-15/17 variants, because they (and apparently only they, despite again being the BEST jets at their old BRs) were “suffering” against F-104s at 9.3. They have never fixed this nor have they even went fully forward with compressing the game further and downtiering all the minor nation jets such as Swifts, Venom, G.91s, whatever at 8.3-9.0 that were not also given this complimentary downtier away from the F-104.
You are attempting to compare the Etendard to the MiGs and F86s that are CURRENTLY at its BR when these are NOT its peers and they have moved lower. The MAJORITY of these plane’s peers are still higher battle ratings. The F86s and MIGs simply need to receive a +0.3br change to fix this.
Not only have I spaded the Etendard, but I have also spaded every aircraft we have mentioned today, full stop. The entire list. At a high performance level as well if that is your next question
Edit: Actually, one aircraft I have not played, IAR.
i won’t be going forward with this either until you address that you are wrong, so that’s that i guess.
The pack Tigers are 5.7 and have better armor than the tech tree version.
90% of the time I shoot it the gunner and transmission get knocked out.
2 Likes
usually when people are right about something they can address what the other side is saying and break down as to why they are wrong;
when people are wrong they usually try to make up excuses as to why they can’t explain, such as what you’re doing. Please address what I have said here:
I have shot it plenty of times only to kill commander
Yes it’s on of the best TDs!! Let’s see it has a really good cannon and… uhhh… and uhhhhhh and the uhhhhh
BMPT ist still OP after the BR change. I had several 10.7 Battles yesterday. Some of them had more than 5 BMPT at the CAP zone, waiting. My reaction was - lets leave here and mark it as another wasted battle
If Leopards 2A4 at 10.7, max BR want to have fun again the only way is to move BMPT up to 12.0, otherwise DM23 does exactly nothing to them. The game is destroyed at 10.7 to 11.7
3 Likes
I feel like every high tier harrier can go down 0.3 BR easily.
The RWR of GR7 (T.10 is the same but BR/environment wise not so much trouble) always gives me a headache, everything is tagged as PD, smh
Agree.
1 Like
I disagree with the IKV 103 change in removing the available ammunition. I would prefer that the IKV 102 (earlier version of the 103) is added as a foldered vehicle in TD line with only the HE and HEAT round to fill the 3.3 GRB BR slot in the TT. I enjoy using the IKV 103 in higher BRs with the HEAT-FS round and this change essentially makes the vehicle less flexible in most in game engagements. If it is seen as problematic in the game balance at 4.0, it can be moved up in BR 4.3-5.3 and given the HEAT FS as a rank 2 mod to compensate instead. The round can do significant damage to vehicles well above 4.0 and it can be disposed of easily by most tanks regardless of BR. It still depends on mobility, good ranging, and concealment to be most effective at a higher BR.
6 Likes
Sweden RB BR’s:
- Sherman III/IV: 3.7 up to 4.0.
This is assuming the vehicle is corrected. It is in fact, not, a Sherman III/IV but a Sherman IB/III. This means it shares an engine with the M4 not an M4A3. If this isn’t corrected then it should be moved up to 4.3 along with the M4A2 as I said above.
6 Likes
Could you perhaps move the the Badger ICV down in BR? Or make the firerate 200rpm instead of 100. Because that thing at the moment is atrocious. You’d actually have a better time bringing the fox or scimitar up to 9.0.
Yea, I have spaded them all except the Chinese one. F104 series after that huge FM nerf really need a BR overhaul.
1 Like
Sweden RB BR’s:
- SAV 20.12.48: 3.7 up to 4.3.
I don’t believe 4.0 will be enough. Sure, this vehicle is a glass cannon but 120mm with a 1.2 second reload and 890g of explosive filler will devastate everything it hits. Sure, the penetration isn’t fantastic but it’s only 9mm worse than M61 APHE at point blank range. This small gap also closes as the range extends with it only being 4mm worse at 500m.
Heavy tank no.6 lacks both the smokes and add on armor
there’s no reason to make it rank III, there’s other 4.0 vehicles in rank II like T-34’s, Stug III, Sturer emil, M4A2, T77E1, etc.
if the cromwell got it’s APHE I would be happy as hell