Id say front penned by br 2.7 AA while in a 3.7- soon to be 4.0 really is.
m24 is fast but so is the AA. m24 gets bounced by other tanks armour while the AA spray doesnt. Both AA and m24 get 1 popped, AA vics get over penned quite often so id even say its more survivable.
Other than range… but again with the m24 its not really a sniper so AA> m24 in every way…
Im pretty new to ground but I dont see what else is coming into play here?
Well clearly if a 4.7 SPAA can do this it should be, very OP vehicle ignoring the fact it’s a useless SPAA, also we’ll ignore the fact I sat there for like 5 minutes trying to kill it, so many times I had to go back to reload
@tokerstar this also isn’t a very good argument, seriously what kinda IS is gonna sit here and let me do this for 3 minutes without nuking my crew?
Finally, the 11.7 Tornados will have some breathing room, but I still think they should be at 11.0. Also, why not move the 12.3 ones down to 12.0 or 11.7? In Air RB, there’s no reason for them to be at such high BRs when they only carry 2 AIM-9Ls .
You could be right - I really don’t know.
Even if arcade has some sort of primitive handling built in (it must be modest else why have STAB on specific vehicles) the game-play differences between the 2 modes would offset something like that.
I don’t play tons of RGB, but when I do I notice that …
I maintain my stance that STAB makes a difference in both modes. Which is why vehicles like the T-34-85 (STB) have the same BR in both arcade and RGB. If STAB was significantly less important to Arcade, I would expect the T-34 to have a BR rating of 6.0 instead of 6.3.
The m/42 bridgelayer wouldn’t be better than the EH. It would weigh more and be harder to traverse with. Not to mention you’ll give away your position to everyone. Might even justify a lower BR.
Gamemode: GRB
Vehicle: challenger 2 2f TES OES CUP
BR: 11.7 > 11.3
reasoning: no where near on par with its with things at its br and much more comparable to things at 11.3 as the tank is arguably worse than almost every other 11.7 and would fit much better with it current performance at 11.3
this would make it the same br as merkava 3s t72B3 IPM1 which are all either on par with or better than the challenger 2 series especially the uparmoured ones
The Slpgr m/43(spårljuspansargranat m/43) on the Pvkv III and Pvkv IV should be 97mm not 88mm. Should help dealing with heavier targets.
This could mean a 0.3 br increase for the Pvkv III anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Aircraft: Mirage 2000D-R1 , Mirage 2000D-RMV
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Br change: Mirage 2000D-R1 12.3>12.0
Mirage 2000D-RMV 12.7>12.3
While the compression is bad i think its ok for the Mirage 2000D-R1 to be the same br as the C-S4 since it has more Countermeasures in trade for Flight performance but maybe it could go below the C-S4 in BR. The Mirage 2000D-RMV is overtiered in Air RB the HMS doesnt help when fighting Su27SM Su30 F15C J10 F-2A that have 3x-5x the missiles you have and better Flight performance.
So apparently the Mirage 2000C-S4 is gonna be the same br as the Mirage 2000C-S5 and Strike Aircraft variant the Mirage 2000D-R1 with a missing Gun Stock No HMS, No 530D and the Mirage 2000D-RMV with HMS a higher br without the 530D and No Gun unless grinded out the Strike Variants are Overtiered only having 2x Missiles for Air RB isnt enough at 12.7+.
I think Air RB NEEDs 15.0 BR minimum best would be 15.3 this again a proof for higher BR numbers and why changing BR’s up and down every now and then isnt gonna do it.
Iv seen that tank eat multiple tank rounds to the side like its nothing. The AA did ok
Gamemode: GRB
Vehicle: Cheiftain mk10 & cheiftain 900
BR: 9.3 > 9.0 (or keep 9.3 with a ROF buff from 7.5s to 5s)
reasoning: these 2 tanks had 0 reason to move up in br in the first place idk how gaijin thinks there fine at the same br as T72 KPZ/MBT 70 being very sluggish and the only reason for the MK10 being turret armour and the only reason for the 900 being a slightly better engine still being worse than the KHALID at the SAME BR however i think all cheiftains would be fine with there current br with a ROF buff
changing the reload from 7.5S to 5S on all cheiftain variants including
Cheiftain MK3
Cheiftain MK5
Cheiftain MK10
Cheiftain 900
Khalid
this would make them better and a bit more deserving of there current br
Then I guess object 906 should go down in BR. And the Hellcat…
Being able to be penetrated by SPAA is such a narrow minded view of balance.
the su-27sm does NOT have TVC and it has the same or fewer missile count iirc they have the same radar, same missiles and basically the same FM.
27SM’s fm is much better than the premium flanker’s bro
I disagree especially for the D-12 - this plane has a severe lack of elevator authority:
This, I think simply moving the Cromwell V to 3.7 is going to be rough without it.
we do not need a mirage 2000 at the same br as phantoms the cs4 is crazy good already (i completely agree with the RMV and R1 however
Why…is the IKV 103 going right down and losing the HEAT it used? Gaijin themselves said it’s about what the vehicle COULD use, and it most definitely did use this. This change is so pointless and how is this a priority over so many other changes. If you wanted a lower BR one, just add the 102 YOU passed for consideration 3 years back and remove the HEAT on that.
Christian II, Strv 121 (possibly other 2A4s, i dont have experience with them)
10.7 > 10.3 OR give DM33+ rounds
reasoning: uptiers are constant with them. in uptiers (which are around 90% of the games i play in these vehicles (not an exaggeration)), they perform miserably. in no way is it fair, or fun go go against BMPTs, T-80s, and other overpowered vehicles at 11.3-7. others who play this BR range on Sweden can most likely back me up here, that its just not fun; at all.
Even just down to 6-6.5 seconds would be a huge buff
