yeah that’s what i thought, you’d really expect the toptier flankers like the MKM, SM, and SM2 to be the best flightmodels but it’s always the 27SM lol
su27sm has better FM and missiles than F15JM and both radars are pretty mediocre.
gripen radar is famously bad, i’d actually take su27 radar over it, and has a tiny weapon loadout compared to either
the curse of being a light fighter in a game where heavy air superiority fighters dominate
the only light fighter i can tolerate and actually even enjoy using is the F-16 series
1 Like
GRB Jaguar IR
11.0 > 10.7
Would be a better fit for the British 10.7 lineup. Jaguar A is getting buff for GRB, so this should help Jaguar IR with this proposal.
jag IR? which one is that?
Doing so bloats the topic to thousands of posts and can cause posts to be flagged as “spam” by people who don’t understand this rule while also making it more difficult for to actually read anything in the thread. Plus, BR changes regularly need to be for multiple vehicles at once or else they cause huge balance problems.
I’m not making an official BR change suggestion, just sharing my reaction :)
F-16s are fun to fly ngl.
F-2A (both) and F-16C are really nice to play
Event plane in the British tech tree
that’s the IS
spaded the F-16A at 12.3, spaded the F-16AJ at 12.7, spaded the F-16C at 13.7, spaded the thai F-16A at 13.7, currently working on the Sufa and Barak, next up will be the netz.
love F-16
get F-2
already spaded
Pz.III N
-
Arcade Battle BR: 3.3 → 3.0
-
Realistic Battle BR: 3.3 → 3.0
-
Reload Speed: 3.3 s → 3.6
Rationale
The Pz.III N is fair at its current BR. Compared to the Pz.III L, the armor is worse since it does not have the applique on the mantlet. The 75 mm howitzer may have more penetration on paper, but this comes at the fair cost of velocity and inconsistent damage, whereas the Pz.III L’s 5 cm gun is far more consistent and easy to use. I therefor don’t think it is necessary to raise its BR to 3.3.
Since much of its competition is going up in BR, it does have the potential to become more dominant in its BR range if it stays at 3.0. I think a small reload nerf would be a good way to mitigate this possible impact without forcing it into an uncomfortable BR or undermining its playstyle.
13 Likes
Yeah a Gripen will out turn and SU-30
a container ship will outturn a Su-30
M24 (TL)
- Ground Battles: Change from Rank II to Rank III
Reasoning:
Other M24 variants, including the M24 Chaffee in the US tech tree, are being moved to Rank III. Why is the M24 (TL) not being considered for Rank III? The only difference is access to APCR, which should justify moving it to Rank III as well. I hope this is just a mistake or an oversight in failing to include it.
15 Likes
Exactly, right now it’s on 11.0, and it’s a bit unusable in lineups because the closest lineup is 10.7, which would be a better fit there, than in an 11.7 lineup
i think they should just give it a wormhole device that spawns infinite ASRAAMs and put it at 14.7 honestly
1 Like
Suggestion:
-Mode: RB
-Vehicle: IKV 103
-4.0>4.0 (or increase) + Let it keep the “slpsgr m/65”
-Reasoning: The HEAT-FS is a unique attribute of this vehicle. There would be little to no reason to play it over the Sav m/43. Lowering the BR to 3.3 makes it face many vehicles with a very short reload rate while it has virtually no armor.
The HEAT-FS does indeed make it gimmicky, but special and interesting.
3 Likes