Updated Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Sure, that is right

A6Ms to 5.7??? I understand A7M2, but the A6M5 does not deserve 5.7 and the A6M6c at 5.3 is absurd

3 Likes

M1297 to 9.3 GRB

1 Like

Then why are you the first one to write this in 2 topics on the forum?
Its fan to turn balance when people arent playing and dont understand the nation tree.

smol

image

because the 27SM isn’t as much of a monster as the Su-30s are right now.
They’re closer in capability to other 13.7s than the premium flankers are to 13.3s

2 Likes

people who have that many games in one vehicle shouldn’t be trusted when they say it shouldn’t get a BR increase

1 Like

He hasn’t played any other vehicles anyways

1 Like

yeah was about to pull stats on him

wait, thrust vectoring?
The Su-27SM doesn’t have thrust vectoring

M24, M4, and T-34 (except the Es) BR increase is very unnecessary.
The M24 isn’t much faster than a Sherman with the same firepower and worse armour, it is just fine at 3.7.
The M4A1 was the most balanced 75mm Sherman at its BR, why is it the same BR as the M4 with better armour? Or even the Sherman II with APCR? They should stay 3.3 and the Sherman II should lose its APCR to join its brothers.
And the L-11 gun on the T-34s being moved up just doesn’t cut it at 3.7; they were perfectly fine at 3.3.
And the Panzer III N? Why 3.3? It’s got a low-velocity 75mm gun with HEAT with not much more pen than the 50mm and a lot less damage. It’s a fun little tank to be sure but I don’t think it warrants a BR increase. The L or StuH are just straight better options in most situations at a lower BR. The L, M, and N should really all be 3.0, no need for them to face 4.3. Or if the M/N are really too strong then all should be 3.3.

1 Like

Im not denying the aircrafts capabilities. Im saying that upgrading it to that level with the current 27SM is foolish.

@aalst i just checked your stats and i’ve come to the conclusion that you should stop speaking

you have NINE VEHICLES in your ENTIRE SERVICE RECORD, and only five in realistic battles, with all vehicles above rank 1 being premium except for the F-2A.

It needs to be 13.7
It’s literally just as strong if not stronger than many 13.7 aircraft.

There is no reason for it to stay at 13.3.

stop advocating for the Su-30MKs 13.3 battlerating, you look kinda pathetic doing that

I’m getting at the idea that the problem might not be the plane itself? But the number of players on it? If 27SM is too strong for 13.7, why doesnt anyone see this as a problem?

because the 27SM is relatively well balanced for its BR and isn’t spammed to hell.

it also helps that it doesn’t face 12.3

  1. it’s not fighting 12.3 planes

  2. it’s not being spammed as much as the premium flankers

Nothing has been spammed more than the F-18 premiums…


most played 13.3 and 13.7 aircraft.

Look at the difference between the Su-30s and the Su-27SM

4 Likes