Its stupid to talk about plane and balance without playing it, isnt it?
I i thing yea l7b should go up 5.7 thing with dive can even cacht f2g so yea it way to low
I’ve played the equivalent and vehicles which are objectively worse at the same br
I’ve spoken to players who have used it and do very well with it.
I have enough experience and enough vehicles at that tier to tell you how good that vehicle is
1 Like
Panzer IV Js shouldn’t be moved up in BR because of the hand-cranked turret, they’re basically M10s with a roof. Unless the M10/Achilles are also increased in BR but just like the Js this isn’t really needed.
Meanwhile Panzer IV H isn’t going up enough, that should be 4.3!
4 Likes
No naval feedback were listened so no need to repost.
I dont know why you are removing the HEAT-FS round from IKV-103. It historically did use it. As you can see in the document the IKV 103 used the slpsgr m/65…
if you want to remove a fictional round remove the yak-9ks nonexistent APHE.
7 Likes
If this is how I do with an objectively worse vehicle.
Imagine how I’d do with the best 13.3 in the game
This is my monthly rn, unfortunately I’m going through a valley of despair rn thanks to playing some very bad vehicles lately but still
1 Like
Yeap been saying same yak 3 ut and all yak 3 vk107 wish once most stronger plane in game should be up on br
1 Like
Air realistic, Ground realistic
AH-1S / AH-1S Kisarazu
9.7 → 9.3
AH-1S is basically an AH-1F (9.7), but worse. AH-1F has IRCM, LWS, HMD.
True, it doesn’t have flares, but its passive IR protection, laser warnings and HMD allow the pilot to simply perform evasive maneuvers faster than the AH-1S, which you’d have to do anyway even if you were deploying flares. On the AH-1S, the pilot has to work harder and faces greater risks than on the AH-1F.
2 Likes
No BR change for the Zeros; they simply lack the engine power to justify a further BR increase. Against almost no other fighter aircraft is it so easy to outrun and reposition.
Su-30MKs must go up
2 Likes
Would you buy a car based on reviews from someone who has never driven it?
Think about it
And the Yak-9UTs fictional NS-45 cannon. It could use the N-37 and the N-45, not the NS-45.
If a plane can use the N-37 it can use the N-45. If it could use the NS-45 it could also use the NS-37.
Simple switch of the barrel is all it takes.
The NS-45 was used on the Yak-9K and it didn’t work. That was the end of the gun for single engined fighters.
4 Likes
Vehicle p47 re why still not fix for the p47 50 caliber bug make more heavy what they already where it haven’t been a fix for monts
it doesn’t matter, Su-30MK needs to be 13.7.
it doesn’t matter how many games you have, it doesn’t matter if the Su-27SM is 13.7.
also, the 27SM does not have thrust vectoring, and it doesn’t have whatever an “aram” is
Genuine question because I’m currently looking at my Falcon, you guy’s removed the APDS belt which I used to own, I now how to purchase a APHE belt… Did all the players who purchased the now removed modification get their SL refunded on its removal?
If they equalize it to 27SM level at 13.7 then its ok
Any reason why the Sherman III/IV isn’t moving to 4.0?
It’s the best Sherman in the game, having the MG port covered up. It shouldn’t be the same BR as the Cromwell V, which has a worst shell, less armor, and no vertical stabilizer.
It simply bullies low tier.
Now that the Chaffee, Pz.IV and even the SAV201248 are moving to 4.0, it feels very odd to leave it at 3.7
3 Likes
27SM should be 14.0 anyways