Updated Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Vehicle: Every single aircraft
Change: Decompress all BRs
Reason: Balance is impossible to achieve at 90% (if not more like 99%) of BRs because the compression is so bad it forces vehicles into being placed more often than not at BRs which are simply “the least worse” but still terrible. More than a few are shoe-horned into totally inappopriate BRs purely because of a loadout reason, like the Buc S2B at 10.7 just because it has 9Ls

This BR change has only highlighted this issue even more. The Mriage 2000C-S5 is moving down to 12.3 likely because its totally outclassed by the F-15s, but that is the same BR as the Tornado GR4/SLE which are waaaay weaker than the Mirage 2000C-S5. If the Su-30 premiums moved up, and then 13.0 could be decompressed and then the F-15s could return to 13.0, then the Mirage wouldnt need to necessarily change.

So please, stop these largely pointless BR changes which dont really do anything and actually decompress Air properly, The max BR needs to be around 18.0 for a half decent start to a full decompression

39 Likes

Su-30MKK, Su-30MK2
13.3 → 13.7 (ARB)
Reason: These are not 13.3 planes. They were never 13.3 planes, they will never be 13.3 planes. If Gaijin refuses to move these up even though they have been the single most complained about aircraft for multiple BR changes now it’d be ridiculous.

This has been posted countless times before, but it will inevitably be posted countless times again until these aircraft are looked at.

53 Likes

Stock loadout changes

Change: Give all Rank IX and VIII aircraft chaff Stock

Reason: These aircraft are dictated mostly by SARH and ARH combat, and they need chaff stock in much the same way VII aircraft need flares stock. Rank IX is perticuarly hard-pressed due to the dominance of AESA radar which means that tactics like Terrain masking and flanking are exceptionally hard

36 Likes

Stock loadout changes

Change: All Rank VI and VII strike aircraft given Stock A2G weapons (even just a limited number of small bombs)

Reason: Many strike aircraft do exceptionally poorly in A2A combat even sapded and yet many are forced to engage in A2A combat to stock grind, without even missiles. Aircraft such as the Jaguar GR1 or Super Eterndard are dependent on gunfighting when stock and this is just unacceptable. Giving them, even just a handful of small bombs or rockets would give them an alternative and make the stock grind much easier, Rank VIII strike aircraft (and possibly a few ex-Rank VIII aircraft) such as the Tornado IDS already get this, and the stock grind is way more reasonable.

17 Likes

The people’s champ

1 Like

Stock loadout changes

Change: All Rank VII aircraft stock SARH

Reason: Rank VIII aircraft already have this and its highly effective in making the stock grind way less tedious. Many aircraft at Rank VII are similar if not the same BR and its unreasonable to expect these aircraft to stock grind with only IR missiles which are usually vastly inferior.

For example Tornado F3 at 12.0 has 2x 9Ls and 2x Skyflash DFs stock and also at 12.0 is the Phantom FGR2 with 2x Aim-9Ds stock. This is just insane imo.

22 Likes

Might be unpopular, but the low-tier GRB changes are nice to see

3 Likes

Nonsense. At first there were just some incomprehensible rating changes, and now they’re officially CRAZY!

Glad to see none of mine ideas went into it :(
Examples:
RB:
Ozelot 9.7 → 9.3
Leopard A1A1: 9.0 → 8.7
BO 105 PAH-1: 9.3 → 9.0
Puma 10.3 → 10.0

SB:
F-4F Early: 10.7 → 10.3 / or F-4F 10.7 → 11.0 (with Aim-9L)

11 Likes

No changes to either pantsir, no changes to Su30MKK/MK2, SLE and GR4 still remain at 12.3.

What a joke of a balance team.

14 Likes

F-14A IRIAF
the-simpsons-he-is-already-dead

8 Likes

Vehicle: Tornado GR1, ASSTA1, IDS (1995)
Gamemode: Air Simualtor
BR Change: 11.7 —> 11.3
Reason: Much like ARB, they are little justifcation to be at a higher BR just because they have guided weapons and in fact, in ASB there are already stronger aircraft at 11.3 such as the Mig-23MLD and F-111C. There is little reason for the these Tornado IDS to remain at 11.7 just because they have GBUs, even in a gamemode where they have limited use

6 Likes

Ozelot

Ground Realistic

9.7 → 9.3

Reason: Every other nation with Manpad SPAA has one at 9.3.
The Ozelot is also outclassed by the Helicopters on that BR, since the Stinger often does not lock beyond 2-3km.
The Ozelot has no gun.
9.3 also has the same or similar Manpad missiles already, such as the Machbet with the same Stingers or the Santal with Mistrals.
It would also give the 9.3 lineup a SPAA.

67 likes on the Original post

13 Likes

So Zeros and Reppus still going up even tho they shouldnt. JH-7 deleting any CAS option for Chinese 11.7 ground lineup other than Q-5L flying vs Pantsir,thanks Gaijin. BI finally going atleast 0.3 up,could do with 7.7 fine tbh.

7 Likes

Vehicle: Harrier Gr7
Gamemode: Air Realistic & Air Simulator
BR Change: 12.3 —> 12.0
Reason: It’s incredibly difficult to justify the Harrier Gr7 a subsonic aircraft, at the battle rating of 12.3. Especially with all the Harrier related issues and the nerfed nature of its defensive suite, but it was just about doing okay. The decision to move the F-15A/J down to 12.7 has however had massive impact on this and this current BR is no longer tenable. If the F-15A/J is truly 12.7 worthy, then everything below needs to be moved down accordingly.

13 Likes

Both premium SU-30’s (MKK & MK2 AMV) should go up from 13.3 → 13.7

Both have major power disparity to any jet that sits even at 13.7 just because of the amount of ordinance they can take. Either reduce their ordinance to at tops 6 missiles and keep them in 13.3 or move them up to 13.7.

But I guess its reprehensible to even slightly nerf the cash cows…

22 Likes

Vehicle: Tornado GR4 & Tornado IDS SLE
Gamemode: Air Realistic & Air Simulator
BR Change: 12.3 —> 12.0
Reason: These aircraft are already pushing it in terms of being “okay” at 12.3, as essentially 11.3 aircraft with more CMs and IRCCM missiles, whether they should be 12.3 or 12.0 or even lower is a debate to be very much had. But with the decision to move the F-15A and moving it down to 12.7, then there is absolutely no justification for the Tornado GR4/SLE to remain at 12.3 as it is very much not only 0.3 worse than an F-15A running 4x AIm-9M and 4x Aim-7M (and thats without even mentioning the F-15J with AAM-3). The aircraft are very much comparable to the Mirage F1s currently at 12.0 and so they should be placed alongside them.

In this latest set of changes, we now see the Mirage 2KC-S5 join the Tornado SLE/GR4 at 12.3 in ARB and the Mig-29s in ASB. These are definetly stronger aircraft

5 Likes

Screenshot 2026-04-22 171209
Wow, that only took several years of complaining

21 Likes

Vehicle: HMS Tiger
Gamemode: Naval Arcade & Realistic
BR Change: 6.0 -----> 5.3
Reason:

On the surface, HMS Tiger looks like a strong ship, with 2x very high rate of fire 6" main guns and 3x Incredibly fast firing 3" secondary guns. But the reality is that HMS Tiger is far weaker than most light cruisers at 5.7 and especially 6.0.

HMS Tiger’s mains guns have 3s reload (80 rounds per minute), which sounds good on paper. However, this is actually pretty poor for the BR. This is marginally better than HMS Liverpool with 9x 6" guns with a 7.5 second reload (72 rounds per minute) but far lower than ships such as USS Atlanta’s 14x 5" guns with 2.8 second reload (300 rounds per minute) or Nurnberg with 9x 6" guns with 5 second reloads (108 rounds per minute)

Compared to 6.0 cruisers since her BR increase, directly compared to something like HMS Belfast with 12x 6" guns with a 7.5 second reload (96 rounds per minute) just makes matter even worse

On top of the fairly poor shells per minute of the main guns, they have massive shell spread, and will rarely all impact the target, Easily 25%-50% of shells fired miss the target due to shell spread. Even at shorter ranges. These guns are only good at taking down aircraft with HE-VT due to their spread, as they act like bird shot. In comparison. 95% of the rounds fired from HMS Liverpool will hit the target due to having a very tight grouping.

Based upon datamines. HMS Tiger’s main 6" guns have double the shell spread of all other British 6" guns in game and there is no justified reason for this increase. If anything, Tiger should be more accurate

Since Tusk Force, the ability to fire the secondary guns at the same time as the Primary guns has been removed. Due to the inherent weapon spread of secondary guns vs naval targets when AI controlled, this has removed them entirely as being an anti-ship weapon vs anything other than coastal boats. I cant see any reason to be firing them manually at a target instead of the 6” guns unless they have been disabled. So this change has eliminated more 50% of the Tigers firepower, especially vs destroyers, which I imagine is the reason for her BR increase to 6.0

As a final note, HMS Tiger also has very poor survivability and cannot withstand fire for very long. She loses crew incredibly fast and due to having so few guns, can be suppressed and disabled very easily. Let alone if ammo racked leaving one or more guns being disabled for an extended period of time.

HMS Tiger, was never a strong 5.7, the increase to 6.0 was already highly unnecessary with the ship in the state it was…… With the further nerfs it has recently received…. It is now impossible to justify being 5.7 and 5.3 would be a more appropriate BR for this air-defence light cruiser

4 Likes

Vehicle: Hawk 200

Gamemode: Ground Realistic

BR Change: 10.7 —> 10.3

Reason: The Hawk 200 could be best compared to something like the A-10A in the US for CAS in GRB which currently resides at 10.3. Whilst the Hawk is faster, the A-10A compensates by having a far larger weapons load and defensive suite. In maximum A2G configurations, the A-10A can field 6x AGM-65B, in addition to other rockets or bombs, and still carry 2x Aim-9Ls and 480 CMs. The Hawk 200 on the other hand, currently at 10.7 could only carry 4x AGM-65B, a single unguided bomb, no AAMs and only 60 CMs, substantially weaker, especially if also compared to the A-10A Late which exchanges the AGM-65Bs for AGM-65Ds and 4x Aim-9Ls currently at 10.7.

6 Likes