The N001VE radar does not have a vertical gimbal in TWS with a bar scan of ±5° off bore shots have to be hard locked. The performance is only different than the C10 in missile capacity which is why it’s already a higher BR than the C10, J8F, etc.
“incredibly similar” the N001 is notably one of the worst radars in the entire game and I’ve already seen what little value your responses have in other topics
Neither does the Su-27SM’s radar have that nor the Russian Su-30 premium.
You can also easily manage that downside by manipulating the radar scan area yourself
2 Likes
So M24 go up to rank rank 3 but Puma dont same for Panzer 4 G and H. Why no literally remove Germany from the game ??? is pathetic the allies bias in this point.
And once again the a single change in hell compression between 5.0 to 7.7
Time to unnistall the game.
I still recommend that the Pvkv m/43 (1963) Go down to 4.7 in all modes facing 6.0 tanks in this vehicle is a pain with its mobility (Weaker engine) being worse than the Pvkv m/43 (1946).
2 Likes
T-34E
T-34STz
T-34 (1940)
And T-34 prototype are all getting nerfed in br.
wtf do you mean?
Have you actually read the new BR changes? More than half of those you have listed are going up
4 Likes
“easily” I’m not gonna respond to you lol you only ragebait and get upset
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
See? Lol
It seems like you are confusing uptiers in balance changes with nerfing tangible attributes of in game vehicles
Because you suffer from skill issue and that clearly influences your judgement.
Radar seems similar to the MK2 radar in the test flight and that performs okay at 13.7, besides that you have HMD which is equally useful if not more useful at 13.3-13.7.
Fine for 13.7
Even with the nerfs PL-12s are fine for 13.7. You act like they are unplayable, but they are still very much usable.
2 Likes
You clearly do not understand what makes flankers good.
I suggest actually learning how to use them
2 Likes
KV-220 6.0 → 5.7 (OR) Reload buff.
reload buff: 7.4 secs aced → 6.7 secs. reason: being pretty equal to an IS-1 / other competitors such as the Tiger 1 it really doesn’t do well in 6.0 matches which are regularly 6.7 it has the same firepower as a 5.7 Russian medium. it also has two loaders so loading as slow as 7.4 secs for an 85mm makes no sense I did a tally at comment 1985, In my post. which concluded 45% of games were 7.0 matches, and 45% were 6.7 matches in which the KV-220 struggles in. 6.3 matches were never found in the 20 games played and the last 10% were 6.0 matches.
Additionally most heavy tanks if full uptiers can still deal with the enemy someway somehow. The KV-220 barely can, it doesn’t reload quick enough, or have the penetration to fight a 7.0 let alone a 6.7 tank. If you see a Tiger II, or T26E5, your dead.
3 Likes
You want a N001 lesser nerfed missile bus to fight 14.7s. that’s why it can’t go to 13.7
To be fair, it’s not like the Ks will be a massive upgrade over the Bs. In best case scenarios, they improve reliability.
Personally, I would rather see a flight model and flight profile change than seeing the Ks.
Remove AHS and it would be solid
isnt like the missile gone with 1 chaff and a bit of turning?
and I still would say the j7d has the performance advantage, has better missiles, more cm and maybe even a better gun…
Sir, this isn’t a BR response. Please call your father who is certainly proud of you