Mate is rivaling me and I play like a silly creature for shenanigans are too entertaining.
Nothing, just an observation
Spoiler
lmao
1 Like
I decided to play a match and instantly lost 22k sl because I had the audacity to get: Shot down by a SAM I couldn’t decect and then was unable to dodge in an F-106 (somehow), and then shot down by a shilka when I tried attacking a convoy.
I want my SL back cause this gamemode sucks with these repair costs. Why are spawn costs a thing? Why do they need to exist? What’s so bad about a death cost (like any other sane mode)? Do you hate us?
youve been on this game for over twice or maybe even three times the amount ive been playing
I mean, my most played tank is the Stormer HVM and I have a 0.5 K/D against tanks in that thing
I’m actually kinda proud about the 1.5 K/D overall with the Stormer
1 Like
S-75? those are supposed to pull 7G at short range and then down to 2G beyond (irl)
Yes, and I’m more confused how I was shot down in the first place despite noticing the missile when it was 4km away.
Single missile stole the efficacy from the rest of the s75 launches. Great sadness.
1 Like
yeah gaijin apparently just straight up removed their G limit for this test
2 Likes
Frankly. Gaijin should add the T249 Vigilante and have it replace the M163 in Nuclear Thunder. It actually has a search radar, like the Shilka, so its existence would not be a surprise your dead vehicle if you didn’t spot it right away
1 Like
37mm gatling go brrrrrt
I really don’t know why they didn’t just use a Gepard/Marksman-like SPAA
not Vietnam-ish enough
Even tho the Gepard is from the 1960’s
I mean, sure, I guess?
The Gepard entered service in 1976 and the Roland entered service in 1977, but yeah
btw this makes ARMs entirely pointless
Lets not forget you cant even target the M163 with ARM’s because it doesnt lock the player till like, 3km, a range where its impossible to ressonably hit with any ARM
1 Like
So is it if you have arm’s but lack esm, the missile will be completely dependent on radar waves and more likely to miss on the ai’s toggles?
it can for special modes, especially if youre claiming the mode is set around an era, only to not have 1990s-2020s trainer jets romping around.
Vietnam could be pretty balanced with a 1955-1965 so that you get sabres and migs but have the early phantom and fishbed as top dog and then a 1965-1975 so that the late 'nam era aircraft dont sealclub the sabres.
of course as a limited time matchmaker. for general play the BR system is the least bad option there is
ngl
this is ass
5 Likes
Unless you do more changes to have proper balance, those timeframes still need curated vehicle lists.
MiG-15s and MiG-17s shouldn’t meet F-4Cs, MiG-21Fs are much weaker than F-4Cs, but the MiG-21SMT is superior to the F-4C.
You also have to take other nations planes into consideration, not just Soviet and American ones.
Just setting arbitrary timeframe limits doesn’t work, the BRs still have to respected. You can ban certain vehicles for not fitting in the timeframe, but you can’t just match 8.3s with 10.0s because they served during the same timeframe.