I want battle rating to 15.0 (Air battle mode) is a minimum for 4+ gen fighter aircraft technology
Bro there is no one who has problems fighting the EBR except you. Just watch your flank and you’ll be fine. Stop complaining about them
1 Like
Oh great! Another BR change set where devs totally ignore the feedback.
What’s even the point…
7 Likes
@Stona_WT can we put the A-5C in 11.3 the next time? I feel like this 10.3 jet isn’t suffering enough.
4 Likes
Pls trailer today
For the most part I’d support decompression for AIR & Ground. But tell me, why is BUK-M3 remained at 12.7 while other top tier SAM’s went to 13.3? I played most top tier SAM’s and BUK-M3 is extremly capable, only second to Pantsir and maybe IRIS SLM is some scenarios.
Also why no decompression for Naval?
1 Like
Actually no, Buk is mediocre as hell, I see it staying well below pantsir SM easily
big, fat, easy to evade
mediocre-bad search radar
its a start i agree with most of the criticism but i would much rather you guys actually do br changes than do nothing so keep up the good work! my advice is to take all suggestions seriously and consider every possibility i know you probably do that but that’s my two cents on the issue.
Its because Pantsir is better than everything else. Buk-m3 is no worse than Nasams-3, SAMP-T and Spyder that now sit at 13.3 and 13.0.
It’s not easy to evade that 100lb warhead lol
2 Likes
Actually, it kinda is.
It’s not that manouverable unless you’re at medium ranges (which good CAS players won’t be) and at close ranges it just dies
Spyder is just pure ass and probably could have stayed 12.7 idk
SAMP-T is actually good
NASAMs is much better than Buk due to having IR missiles
You sure played them? At close range buk missile pulls better than aster-30
Glad to see that, once again, almost none of the player feedback was considered.
Hopefully the upcoming “custom” BR settings based on loadouts will help.
Until then, J-7Ds will stay undertiered, F-104s will stay overtiered, and numerous other poorly balanced vehicles will continue to be poorly balanced.
4 Likes
here to bring more attention to this
as usual , gaijin’s monkey paw curls
the previous BR brackets were much more reasonable in having top tier (14.3-.7) contained to itself
the new bracket should obviously be 14.7-15.0 , otherwise it defeats the intended purpose of decompression
also , if gaijin wont do anything about the MCM meta , at least contain the spread of the disease to the AESA class
That is an explanation, but it’s still no excuse.
There are other ways to balance, like adjusting SL/RP multipliers, adjusting the gameplay loop for ground pounding, or not putting the premium on sale every 5 minutes.
Right, but it’s a valid point to say it shouldn’t be that way.
Balance should be a gameplay decision, not a financial decision. If the plane is earning too much RP or SL, nerf the multiplier… don’t make it unplayable. A-5C is already very mediocre at 10.7. J-7D is already OP at 10.7.
Buk has a massive deadzone above it, SAMP doesn’t
Buk’s only “advantage” for pull is that the missile doesnt start going straight up
after that it’s only worse besides the fact that you need to kill a minimum of two of its vehicles to actually kill it, unlike SAMP’s 1
I’m just explaining why it went up
At least a10c only went to 12.0. I guess “bro they might think we have 0 clue how this game works” clicked somewhere in snails mind. Too late tho.
Moving the AJS37 Tech tree variant to 11.7 for ground from 10.7 is the most unneeded change in the swedish air tree we already have terrible choices for cas around 10.7 and now the only semi good one got taken why? the AJ37 stayed. The only difference is the AJS37 gets 24 built in countermeasures and can always take 2 rb24J’s which suck but if I want a gun I only get 3 mavericks so explain why this needs to be 11.7 please cause it makes no sense.
2 Likes