Update 2.59.0.92

So when is this change going live?

LAV-AD is literally at 10.0, theres no point in using M247

2 Likes

Good update overall but the python 3 fighters are still left to rot and the mgi23 will be a terrorist this update

1 Like

No claude.

1 Like

This “Battle Rating” (BR) update has completely ruined the game’s balancing. Aircraft and helicopters have been shifted into a BR range where they face both air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles—all while lacking the countermeasures needed to defend themselves. The German “Gepard” anti-aircraft system has been moved up from 8.3 to 8.7, creating a gap in the German anti-aircraft lineup between 6.7 and 8.7. Furthermore, it is utterly absurd that the Alouette II (in the German research tree) has been moved from 8.3 to 9.0, while other nations have received helicopters at BR 7.7—Sweden even goes a step further, offering a helicopter equipped with guided missiles at BR 7.7. Surface-to-air missiles begin appearing at BR 9.3, yet helicopters and aircraft at BR 9.0 have absolutely no countermeasures against them, rendering these vehicles practically useless. In my personal opinion, whoever made or proposed these changes clearly didn’t bother to look at how things actually play out in the game; they likely just took names and BR values ​​from a PDF and decided, “Let’s just change it to this.”

2 Likes

Supposedly it works great for munition interception with its proxy fuse.

But I suck at that so idk. They need to move the chap to be foldered with the xm246 and release AA to fix all the holes they made for different BRs

@Smin1080p_WT

Can you maybe explain to me, why the two Stirling bombers are respectively 4.0 and 4.7 in realistic battles?

It is not that they are either of those two BR, but more why is there such a big difference between two near identical planes? If the BR difference were only 0.3 i could understand, but not a BR difference of 0.7 with such a small stat difference.

It is genuinely confusing for me.
I have been highlighting it in BR changes for 3 years now.

As an example of why it is confusing to me.
The B-17E/L and the B-17G-60-VE are both the same BR in Realistic Battle, BR 5.0. However there is a bigger difference of stats between these two planes, than the stat difference between the Stirling Mk I and the Stirling Mk III which have a BR difference between each other of 0.7.

Ts shit plane has such inconsistent acceleration and bad handling that the only good counter part the kosava agm is which also suffered a nerf from 0.9m to 0.7m speed. this make the planes performance to a underperforming full price premium jet

If we see each other at 1000m at the same time, you are dead and by the time your ATGM gets to me i’m already behind cover! How is that objectively better? Maybe at 100m it doesn’t make to much difference but it just isn’t worth it at all.

What’s the point of asking for and taking feedback when we can clearly see that you don’t read any of it…

3 Likes

Let´s be Real this BR Update did more Harm then good

3 Likes

Why is the Chinese F-16 MLU 14.0 (Simulator) in the game but 13.7 (Simulator) in the spreadsheet? Why isn’t it 13.7 in the game as well? @Smin1080p_WT

1 Like

The changes for the Hawk T.1A were missed ingame.

The document states they should be moving to 7.3 in AAB, ARB and ASB, but ingame they are still 7.7.

1 Like

about the BR BY louduts dose that mean if i use the mig-25 r-40rds and td it would go up to 11.3 or wil it still stay that same on 11.0 just asking

Leopard 2 PSO getting moved before EMBT? what could that possibly mean. 👀

Another day gaijin leaves their blatantly handheld, undertiered Su-30s at the same BR as the ADFs.

4 Likes

In what world is Abrams and Booker at 11.0, meanwhile you have 2s38,bmp-2m,turms-t,moderna,t64b,t72s, and t80ud lower BR than them clearly this update was only to please russian players since they got the most benefit from it(also let’s not forget they intentionally won’t fix the shell on Abrams or give it a better one for increase in BR)

3 Likes

11.0 a5c lmao

4 Likes

That’s right.

@Stona_WT
Why are you playing games, Gaijin? Stop beating around the bush and just put the Kfir Canard—with its two measly AIM-9G missiles—on BR 12.3 right away. The players can handle it… -_-’

2 Likes

Somehow yall made it worse???