Not saying there is more, mind you. I agree with you that outside of few exceptions, gun launched ATGMs are straight up worst opinion.
I’ve seen some TSS players say you can use them to bonk MBTs (usually Abrams) over small hills
But that is very situational and not worth considering really
I’m genuinely starting to wonder just how much “players feedback” you’ve actually received.
Are all these players expressing frustration with the BR changes simply whining?
Even if you consider their complaints to be nothing more than whining, doesn’t that still count as feedback?
You say these changes were based not only on statistics but also on feedback from fellow players. Then why does it seem like only certain feedback is being taken into account, while so many opposing opinions are being disregarded?
If player feedback genuinely plays a role in these decisions, shouldn’t you be more transparent about which feedback is being considered and how it’s being evaluated?
You can’t simply point to “players feedback” to justify a decision without explaining why so much negative feedback appears to carry so little weight.
1 Like
Crazy bc they could make actual good br placements and then adjust the SL modifiers
Like that?
6 Likes
@Stona_WT
@Smin1080p_WT
Can we get a reasonable explanation to why the:
Obj. 906
TO-55
M41D
And the Aubl 74 HVG went up in br?
Or the Freccia
CCVL (is a higher br than the XM8 for absolutely no reason)
Sidam mistral…
They’re all okay tanks but do not preform well enough to warrant a br increase.
especially not the Aubl 74 HVG. That thing is so bad.
Yet the T26E5 wasn’t bumped to 7.0 despite it preforming much much better than anything listed above.
I’m genuinely confused how any of those got picked. This list feels so random.
This list legitimately made me depressed.
1 Like
holy peak
1 Like
I made sense didn’t I?
While their are definitely some weird Br decisions, you’re more likely to find people complaining than supporting thr changes
5 Likes
In the recent past, the Battle Rating of those helicopters that did not have Fire and Forget missiles was changed. For a short period, the Apache D variant finally had uses in lineups with other vehicles, but now with this change they return to limbo, as they are in an isolated Battle Rating:
AH-64D - only the M1A1 exists in BR 12.0;
AH-64DJP - only the Challenger 3 exists in BR 12.3;
AH-64DJP - only the Type 81 (SPAA) exists in BR 11.7;
Please review and readjust the Battle Rating of these helicopters so that they can be used again in lineups with the other vehicles of the respective nation.
1 Like
poor AGS got uptiers again
soo can we got M900 then ?
3 Likes
To my shock and awe, I’m in luck today
1 Like
UH-1C @ 9.3
Mi-24D @ 9.0
Gaijin logic.
6 Likes
Yeah I don’t get what’s up with terrible helis being move up to just be bad again.
2 Likes
Name me 1 proxy shell you can see.
It just doesn’t have any tracers in the belt.
And it’s not OP, it’s shells are so slow, and the flash from the guns is so bright you know when it’s shooting at you, and you can easily dodge.
Only people who are too close or flying in a straight line didn’t that thing.
It’s also one of the few spaa’s that struggles to kill ground vehicles.
Then why did the Aubl 74 HVG go up?
Everyone knows it’s bad.
It preforms terribly.
I’m genuinely baffled… I could go on about the Mi-24D and others too, since I have played a vast majority of vehicles in the game at this point.
As I said:
4 Likes
Still made more sense for them to go up higher than stay down lower, it’s about decompression not “I want my OP stuff to stay low”.
And FYI I do play the Abrams and Leos and every other top tier MBT, I am well aware of the tank’s capabilities to make such statements.
