And 3 br step below roland there is chapparal. 3 br steps below pgz04a there is chief marksman. 3 brs below marksman there m163.
Yup. They have basically just made BRs totally and completely pointless
1 Like
As I said before, the Story Repeats itself…
Ka-50
2S38
BMPT
Now the Prem Su-30s
Etc
3 Likes
Soyuz too.
There is no 7.7-8.3 that can do much more than annoy a Soyuz in top tier naval. But its fine because Soyuz vs Soyuz is balanced
2 Likes
Isnt the Soyus TT? :3
i wont touch naval until the soyuz is removed
It is, but same principle. OP as hell, operating in a Vacuum with nearly no equal, just destroying anything and everything nearby
I need only 2 more cosstel boats, than I am free with Entire Germany :3
I stopped. I was really excited for KGV to be added, but I havent even started the RP grind for it because its DOA
I need to crack on with Coastal tree, but the RP gains need ot be doubled at a minimum
So kinda like Bismarck, played it line 4 times (1st kill was a Hood via Ammorack ofc ), but now, abandoned the realy big boats…
Or how about Cutting the RP costs for Rang 4/5 in half?
320k for a 4.3 is just insane
2 Likes
That would work too.
Actually treat it like BR 1-4 of naval
Efficiency? Everyone uses heli to anti tanks, but only Chinese heli are ridiculed as a SPAA. I suggest you may guess why.
2 Likes
Of course, when there is an anti air that somewhat stands a chance against cas gaijin simply moves it up. Let the poor cas players just continue annihilating tanks in GROUND RB without having to use their brain. Unbelievable.
5 Likes
Wouldn’t it be interesting to test a narrower matchmaking spread for jet battles? Instead of the current ±1.0 BR, perhaps something like ±0.7 (or even ±0.3/±0.4) as an initial experiment.
For example:
11.3 could face 11.0–11.7 , instead of having to deal with matchups like 11.7 vs. 12.7 or 11.7 vs. 10.7 .
This would likely result in slightly longer queue times, but it could be much more rewarding in terms of RP and Silver Lions, while also improving overall quality of life and the learning experience for jet gameplay. Players wouldn’t have to jump straight from fighting aircraft armed with Fox-1 missiles to facing advanced Fox-3 platforms loaded with weapons like the R-77-1.
Sorry if I’m forgetting some missile names—I stopped playing top-tier jets after finishing the U.S. tech tree and its endless collection of AIM-120D/C/A/E/F/G/H/I missiles. (I know everything after the AIM-120E doesn’t actually exist in the game!)
Would this actually help in any way, or is it just a terrible idea ?
OBS : USA need AIM-9X
1 Like
But an F-16AM with half the countermeasures and less missiles facing those aesa is considered balanced? This frankly makes no sense.
3 Likes
Perhaps they consider four AIM-120Bs to be very strong, even with all its shortcomings.
Viggen DI has 4x AMRAAM, and 2x Aim-9Ls and a gun, all on a supersonic platform.
i think thay should down tier the pt16-mod i think 11 is a little too high the only thing it has its the reload