we can’t hurt su30 sales now can we
3 Likes
For aircraft, these are some of the dumbest BR changes yet, with clearly zero input taken from the community.
Oh boy, can’t wait to farm easy F-14A IRIAF kills with the AESA Typhoon, or Hunter F.6s with the MiG-21bis (if there’ll still be a single soul playing that thing now).
2 Likes
But the M26 are STILL 6.7. How dense can ya be??? And who decied for the M247 TO GO UP??? Ya really are killing America’s answer to cas. LAV still at 10.0 is wrong, should be 9.3 or 9.7, M247 shouldve stayed 9.0 and all 35mm spaa should be the same br, 8.3 or 8.7, make up ya minds.
Why are you deliberately avoiding the MI‑24A?
After the nerf involving the removal of the ballistic computer, it is inferior to the MI‑24D in all respects, and both are at the same BR. There’s no point in using the MI‑24A now that there’s an MI‑8TV at 8.0 .
+After the purchase, the MI‑8TV has 2 9M14 units right away, while the MI‑24A has only an unguided rocket.
T26 was saved and the AH1s going to 7.7 is a nice change
The rest meh
Continuing the discussion from Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026):
Can all the aircraft that are totally doa against these 13.7s sat at 13.3 please move down out of sight then?
Just because an Su30 Vs Su30 is considered balanced doesn’t mean that a GR4 Vs Su30 is balanced
8 Likes
Or imagine, hard BR cap like we had a few years ago for 9.7, meaning they could face only 8.7-9.7, but not 10.0 and higher
2 Likes
Hard caps sure would be nice, but that would hurt the queue times
Can’t have longer queues these days
It was meant to move the A-4H, not the E
ok, thk u
2s6 to 11.0 is such a good change
1 Like
Ye, but doesnt change the fact that these 2 Prem Su-30s ruin the MM for litarally any other plane around it, but as its a RU/china prem we cant move it…
Looks at 2S38/BMPT/Ka-50 etc…
1 Like
( didn’t mean to reply to your post lol)
they also can’t move french NF-5 premium
1 Like
Reminder AH-64’s are also one BR step lower now, while being better in almost every regard
Well… with the exception of now having to add a Hunter F6 to 9.7 suggestion to my list. Not a single one of my suggestions passed.
So the Google Doc remains ready for next time
From when it was added until like 1 or 2 years ago.
It was running at almost the same performance as the is-2s. Like 60% of the tiger2h.
After the engine nerf, it doesnt need to go up.
I’d like to see a full analysis of people playing at 12.3 and how many matches result in facing 13.3 opponents, anecdotally I’d suggest the prevalence is going to be very high.
What? Give perma full down tiers?
Then give 10.0 perma full uptiers? Hell no.
idk why this replied to you sorry
