Russian cash cow? Nerfed? Funny joke.
1 Like
Hey, that is what they are asking for. Im game for free kills
My man you’re the one who acted like I didn’t played with JAS39E while in reality i have both of those jets.
You do realize first batch of JAS39E are based on JAS39C airframe in real life right? Which indicates that Gaijin chose to implement early variant of Gripen E.
J10C’s biggest weakness is the endurance due to how low the fuel capacity is, most of the time you have to fly at 105 percent throttle if you want to stay on battlefield which effects your flight performance a lot, you can take drop tank but it will cost you the additional missiles you’re carrying under your belly which makes it essentially J10A with AESA radar but worse flight performance at much higher br.
Meanwhile JAS39E can always stay at full throttle due to much higher internal fuel capacity without sacrificing any missiles.
5 Likes
None of these bar MiG-21 have radar missiles, and the radar missile MiG-21 has cant compete with late sparrows.
The only thing you have to do to defeat sparrows is hold S and A/D
100% agree, there is no 11.0 radar missile or even radar to compete (only exception is F4J i think)
F-4J is 12.0
then its EJ version from japan, idk i dont own it
No Yak-9K (or any of the Yaks that can have the 45 mm gun) br raise? Or maybe get rid of their fictional APHE shell?
Also can we please have a “Historical Pfps” Toggle!
3 Likes
Why even bother? Compression is still insane for anything under 13.0.
Naval compression is just beyond comprehension.
Congrats on you guys doing all of 30 minutes of work and picking 3 random suggestions so you can say “we listened to the community”
3 Likes
Together with the low fuel, the extremely low CM count on the J-10C is really limiting. Also the really high drag and the wrong engine should be fixed.
Considering the new meta is BVR the lack of range of the PL-12 compared to the AMRAAMs or the R-77-1 can definitely be felt.
IMO the cm count is much more damning than the fuel load.
You’re forced to only bring like 18 flares at top tier, so the moment someone shoots more than 4 ir missiles at you, you’re cooked.
Pl-12s though are amazing, though slightly worse than r77. pl8b are mid.
I miss my r73 on j11a, such a better missile
2 Likes
If Gaijin bothered to add WS-10 engine to J-10C fuel consumption wouldn’t be as bad as it is right now, not to mention it would’ve better flight performance as well.
Main problem is that combination of low CM counts, fuel consumption, an engine that doesn’t even compensate the additional weight and huge drag.
If those problems fixed then yea I could see the J-10C at 14.7 without problem.
3 Likes
is that a reason to ignore the gripen e and all his problems like gaijin is doing ? just a quick internet research and you can list everything he is missing curently
thats a lie, and what you re saying doesnt make sense, but if you think you re right then stay on this mindset and drop stats to prove your superiority on a simple talk
Once again, there has been no consideration given to coastal fleet decompression, nor any meaningful BR revisions based on community feedback for naval vessels.
This is a massive disappointment, especially for those of us who actually actively play coastal battles.
7 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Yeah, the PL-12 isn’t a bad missiles, but probably should be buffed a little bit in range, irl it should be comparable to the AIM-120B range.
Also yes, fuel isn’t even that big of an issue considering most matches last 5 minutes, but only having 72cm forces you to be extremely conservative when notching or flaring.
They should also add the option to carry the PL-5-EII imo, in some cases it feels better than the PL-8B
1 Like
thats why you gotta buy the 30MKK so you can carry both the Pl-12 and r-73
Already did, not a single guilt.
J11a is probably slightly better cause it’s lighter and gets maws, but the rwr is a turn off for most people though (though imo with maws it’s more than fine)