Same story again . . you can be hull down with Jagtiger and tank same shots even better. Tiger 2 can easly pen the cheeks if it gets good shot.
1 Like
Im not sure bout that. its got a 150mm/120 mm flat plate next to the gun at 6.7 and 225mm/200 mm at 7.3. anything flanks you youre dead anyhow. The only really insane part is the prod. 1100 hp engine combined with that good armor (frontally). That makes one good tank that is still a casemate with good mobility at a br where just one tiger II or t26e5 is better (similarly strong or even better frontal armor profile and mobility like the prototype at 6.7 while having a turret and 1 second quicker reload for similar strong shell in case of the tiger 2) and those nations have multiple vehicles with similar capabilies at these brs. what else?
1 Like
Maximum undercarriage load. 600kg for a MG would be a bit much dont u think? :D
1 Like
About that R2Y2 i am also very curious, all 3 planes are crap.
They would even lose to a Su-11 which is absolutely not OP at all no no… not in air or ground… no no.
or VK-107… or BMPT just recently before patching it…or 279… or BI… or Yak9K… or T55 AM that startet life as a 8.3… or 2S38 before they patched it… or yak23 when it was 7.7 back then…or the Mig 15 Bis ISh that still sits at 8.0 for no reason…or Ka50… i can name u probably 100 vehicles that where and often are still OP on the russian side, but only like 20-30th on all other nations combined. Just because they are very limited in use by players, dosnt mean they are not OP. And its also a known fact that they tinker around with modules since the introduction of the detailed modules to “balance” russia out… thats why some tanks have turret rings the size of the whole tank (rdf,hstvl) or the Ka-52 got the detailed models months before the Ka-50 to push sales.
1 Like