Update 2.51.0.41

[Doomboltz]

Apparently the RP bug is back?

Well what do you know, I found another proof: [image] Before I started playing the Swiss F-5E to stock grind it, I bought an expert crew for it. As you know, once you buy an expert crew, you can grind the ace crew by gaining a specific and high amount of research points, but it also shows you the progress. And as you can see, the total amount is 237,715 research points that I’ve grinded through the ace crew, the exact amount that SHOULD be present for my modifications as well, but 65,473 res…

I posted it here and I was told to post a bug report so it can be ignored.

[Константинович7]

News regarding the R-400 bug?

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WLvGqhICodX9

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/uiqE6y7fLsLj

[Doomboltz]

Also lets not forget that Gaijin gaslit the players everytime they talked about this issue, and it took them so many years and pressure to even acknowledge there’s even a problem to begin with the RP gain system. I won’t be surprised that they ignore this as well.

[Necronomica]

Ah, yeah that makes it clearer, thank you :)

Looks like something is off at first glance yeah, not entirely sure though as i don’t handle bug reporting at all. The reason i commented what i did the first time is that it previously has been a visual issue, even though everyone got their RP as they should. This might be a new thing.

6 Days ago isn’t really that long to wait for a report to get handled, but if you have questions about reporting or any specific report then you can send a private message to one of the Technical Moderators to ask about it.

@Necronomica

You can find all the teams and the areas they handle listed here: (Who is who and Reporting Procedure). If you don’t get an answer within a few days you can add more moderators from the list to the original message instead of sending a new message (that way you preserve the date of the message and it doesn’t look like a new request), adding one of the moderators to the message every 2-3 days or so until you get an answer.

Please do not to add the seniors until you have tried all other regular moderators, the Seniors likely won’t answer unless they are added and pinged by the regular moderators but if you’ve added all the regular moderators with no answer then you can add the seniors.

[Rei_Garreter]

@kingoftigertank

compared with other irccm

AIM-9M most of time gets flared also in last months for sure

[Zitrone3_2]

@kingoftigertank

seems way to flare hungry compared with other irccm missiles,

Same IRCCM as magic 2, pl5e2
You can check for your self in the files

[Zitrone3_2]

diffrent IRCCM, try only shooting 9M’s in side aspect

[kingoftigertank]

yeah but those missiles do not appear to be effected by flares so badly as r73, r73 is as bad as r60m for how flare hungry they are especially from the rear too which they’re meant to be less sensitive from. just feels like the missile is not set up correctly as it behaves like a more manoeuvrable r60m

[Zitrone3_2]

make a bug report and provide proof

[Qman02]

it not aircraft related mostly, its a decal problem i think

[FutureScrap]

So, any update on the bug fix for Naval Forces, regarding AI ships putting fires out in few seconds?

Ive even noticed that they are able to put fires out when they are way below 10% crew. It turns the whole fight against them into a whack-a-mole with crew, unless you can get a direct hit to the magazines. Something is clearly broken with them and this new damage control system.

Its been like a week or so now and nothing yet. Theres also been multiple bug reports made about it and apparently its a known issue, but would be nice to get an update on it? Is anything being done about it soon?

I really dont want to touch Naval when its like this, it makes the battles feel horrible.

[Doomboltz]

I got something else for you as well, take a look at this screenshot:

When I started stock grinding the EF-2000, I also bought an expert crew for it before starting, but this time instead of jumping in and out of matches, I stayed throughout the whole match to get the full reward, and as you can see, the modification RP and the ace crew progress shows the same number, meaning that by doing this, no RP was lost.

While in the case of F-5, with the evidence I posted, so much RP went missing because a modification finished its research during another match that I was playing. It’s clear as day thta something is wrong, otherwise. It’s impossible to have more ace crew progress for a vehicle than the amount of RP you have gained with it.

Now I’m aware you don’t handle bug reports, but I wanted to shed some more light on this matter.

[int_main]

Lost 13,400 RP on Mi-35M from Heli PvE grind today

[Stona_WT]

This is not a place to report bugs.
If you want to report bugs, please submit valid bug repots here: Community Bug Reporting System
If you have questions regarding your bug reports and/or answer made from staff, please send a PM to Technical Moderators.
Thanks!

[Scärlett]

i did no response :(

[Charlouse]

What about AA for Naval? You said it was fixed but I still see 20/23/25MM sniping from 10 km away… It’s not april yet, so don’t try to fool us but you didn’t fix nothing, right?

[UniqueScorpions-live]

@Stona_WT

Have they fixed the loud as all hell track sounds?

[Doomboltz]

It’s not a bug. They increased the sound of tracks, it was mentioned in the spearhead changelog.

[Zitrone3_2]

@Stona_WT

If you have questions regarding your bug reports and/or answer made from staff, please send a PM to Technical Moderators.

This must be a hard troll at this point

I really get that they are busy and have tons of msgs but like it is not a real option to msg them, i have been waiting for around 5 months for a response

[Zitrone3_2]

in the message at the bottom you can click add or remove and can add a new tech mod to the dm, this way you don’t have to type it all out again