It’s typical fashion for USSR vehicles, if they’re slightly good they get nerfed because every body complains, but USSR players hardly ever complain
This argument is correct the obj140 but bmd4m was insane at 9.3 and it deserved the br increse. I still dont get who asked for the obj140 nerf
10 Likes
I would say it was good, not necessarily OP. It’s very allergic to .50 cals and auto cannons.
It busted the 9.3 lineup
Guys, guys, the time to discuss (whine) about the changes are over. This is your new reality.
6 Likes
Well its a light tank. A light tank that has gen2 thermals while people have gen0, has insane mobility with a tandem atgm at 9.3 and aircraft tracking
4 Likes
F-16A MLU - Stock Aim-9Ps at 13.3, and Aim-9Ls at RANK 2 mods? IS THIS A JOKE?
If you’re going to move it up, at least make it playable. Remove the AMRAAMs and put this back at 12.7… Or remove the Aim-9Ps. But right now having rear aspect missiles ONLY for 2-3 modification grind at 13.3, is criminal.
3 Likes
So in GRB, the Marut without flares, CCIP/RP, MCLOS bullpups or any kind of smart weapons should be the same BR as the Bucc which has flares, has CCIP/RP and bullpups?
Just because the Hunter F6 isnt a good CAS plane doesnt mean that the Marut should be bad too… maybe the Hunter F6 is over BR for GRB too? Gaijin literally split the BR system for planes to allow for planes without smart weapons to have a lower BR lol.
1 Like
4 Likes
Okay, I will admit, I am laughing at Gaijin taking away Sparrows from everyone when adding AIM120… surely, that wasn’t intentional, lol.
2 Likes
I still disagree that it’s as powerful as the Beglit. The amount of things I one tap, at bad angles too, with the Beglit is insane. There is no equal to it. The atgm launcher isn’t even all that necessary, and its survivability is great.
Don’t get me wrong, I understand the Bmds vs 8.3s was maybe a bit much… but at the same time, Gepards, Bradley’s, etc are still at 8.3 to this day.
1 Like
Yeah, I have both the Object 140 and all of the BMP’s+BMD’s lol. While I didn’t “want” the BMD’s to go up, I can understand and will be ok still. However, the Object 140 going up is just dumb.
BMDs got themselves a new friend, at least
4 Likes
I am happy that the Su-7 variants got moved down for Air RB, but why not as well for Ground RB?
Unfortunately, Tu-4 still keeps its legacy BR of 8.0, where it can even face SARH missiles.
1 Like
The problem with it being 9.7 is you’ll almost always get 10.7 matches.
At least at 9.3 it was a toss up.
1 Like
Ew kriz
French ground lineup successfully ruined thanks, also when are you disclaiming that no one cares about player feedback anyway ? it would at least be better that way.
5 Likes
oi, you take that back. 500m/s ATGM nukes. Eitherway, who cares about 10.7 uptiers in BMDs, lol.
for the love of god put the Su-27 and J-11 and Su-33 at 13.0 in sim
God Damn gaijin. If you want us to feel like your listening, at least tell us why not even half the suggestions are being taken into consideration…
@Smin1080p_WT Do you have anything to say in the matter or are we just stuck with the same old compression for another year untill you get enough “stats”, with some vehicles like the F-104s.ASA stuck in limbo as im one of the 5 guys who plays it?
11 Likes
Begleit is really worse than the bmd. It has a way worse missile and most importantly it cant fire the missile on the move
1 Like