When axis spgs from future with heatfs and hesh will be removed from ww2 lineups?)
It is. No other allied tanks have armor. Even Pershing Jumbo has no armor, if we will take into account long barreled acht-acht (elephant, jagdpanther, tiger 2), HEATFS on st-a1, r3, type 60 and other.
Then it is whole different conversation, because there is plenty of well armored vehicles with long 88 in German lineup.
Tiger 2 P is even on lower side of that spectrum.
Hopefully soon, but an incremental change is better than no change at all.
I just don’t get this obsession with symmetry.
I have played enough of both sides to know, that there is plenty of other things to consider, which greatly affect effectiveness of each vehicle there.
Can you add the Israeli Sho’t to the 7.7 SIM Matches? As far as I’m aware, it’s not there since I can use the British Mk.3 but not the Sho’t.
Its not about having 100% balance, but the t26e5 was the ONLY allied tank that offers any armor at that bracket. It is the only one that can maybe survive a hit from the long 88mm. Very usefull when you fight multiple tanks with 88mm, especually if you need to load apcr and hope your armor saves you from ferdinand. Now, that will never happen, because the moment you make a mistake as allies you die, as for the axis, they have well armored well armed tanks that can look at enemy and shoot while the allies must aim for weak spots or waste time loading apcr
This is true, removing the t26 does not help the situation, but removing the ferdinand and other long 88 well armored tanks does not help either. the t26 was the balance for the german long 88 armored tanks, i dont understand the decision to remove it
I see your point, this also likely made it way overused, which in turn hurt variability of vehicles in matches.
I am not saying that I know, how Gaijin balances the game, but from info I have, could see that for them T26E5 was clear outlier that visibly sticked out in statistics (likely win rate and pick rate at least).
Given that in Sim we are limited to just 3 vehicles, pick rate might be more important metric than in other game modes.
(my speculation) Also this bracket seems to be limited to lower part of 6.7 RB spectrum, which T26E5 is obviously not, so I could see it being more fitting to higher brackets in this regard as well.
its not cold war highest it is is Korean war as it was currently in service with the army when the Korean war broke out
When are aa-20 Nords going to be fixed it has been 8 months
2 Likes
2 Likes
So it wasnt my imagination that TAA was really blurry.
I remind you about the community requests that you have been ignoring for 10 years.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Kg9VW8Vw8LvU
3 Likes
Looks like I no longer have to choose between megablur and a headache. Thanks for the fix.
1 Like
Still no improving the Viggens :(
This bug is older than some of the people who play this game
1 Like
Still waiting
1 Like
If you look at the bottom of the post you linked you can see that a manager posted 2 months ago that a solution is in the works. Hope it comes in December.
Mines all been accepted, no idea about the internal report on the RB74