waht is this
Damage over time, in other words, the burning effect
1 Like
Always welcome, seeing exploits fixed. :)
And if a vehicle’s “only” useful trait is being able to abuse an exploit, you get no sympathy when it’s inevitably fixed. If a vehicle is meaningfully negatively affected by these fixes, it’ll end up going down in BR anyway.
4 Likes
i tried it myself, 3xBLU-27/B still leave 10-15% HP
1 Like
Oh this is interesting, i am testing out with the Ju288C, and 3xC250 are enough
2 Likes
go play it like a fighter as intended
2 Likes
well, no shiet. low tier base has lower HP than top tier.
people here is talking about top tier
bases needed 4 C250 before to get destroyed, so i guess its the same comparison here
2 Likes
Apparently they also added a fifth base HP bracket above 5.0, that’s not mentioned above.
Before 288C (BR 6.0) targets and high tier base bomber targets would have been the same HP, now they’re not. Affects all matches with a BR 8.0 or higher.
2 Likes
Ignore him, you can not say anything with some one who never fly it
it can carry 6 air to air missiles, its a premium.
why did you use a fighter as a bomber, at that point use the AJ35 instead.
because that can carry retarded bombs, which can destroy your bases for that free SL and RP you so need
2 Likes
Consider using the large number of 7Fs and 9Js you get on that plane!
1 Like
does this affect airfields in air simulator battles aswell?
1 Like
Could always get the A32A the jet that performed so bad gaijin actually looked at it and saw that it didn’t belong at 9.3 and moved it to a br where its still mid lmao. Seriously cant believe people bought that thing lmao
2 Likes
What you just said proves that you haven’t read anything I said
1 Like
Bases have armour!?
1 Like
Also, this was actually good changes for SBEC because SA servers had people spamming rocket spam and pharming under the guise of “PvE games”.
One of big steps for punishing Chinese farmers in SBEC.
1 Like
Well,this is result of single Flamm C500
And this is what two did
2 Likes
You guys are just looking for a reason to reduce the benefits of players destroying bases. This change was made so quickly, much faster than the R&D point bonus promised one year before. You said you would talk to players about battle rates for bombers & attackers and base gains, but you implemented the program without doing so.
8 Likes