Realized that the ones I have is still marked restricted even though they are now public info to South Africa. Not gonna be the one to “leak” even though it is no longer a leak.
That said, now that they are unrestricted I will make mission to archive and pull the data + other stats.
We have also retired the DARTER in place for the IRIS-T so the DARTER is now public info ( we selling of the stock to other countries like Brazil).
O.o
It was fun while it lasted folks, some dev got tilted while groundpounding in its Su-25SM3 because it got shot down by a 120 with a poor launch profile and decided to push a nerf to kill it at short ranges, not to mention there’s already videos of 120s failing to connect because of the missing AOA, and therefore, capable overload.
Actually nuts how little pull the AMRAAM has now.
ngl this is AIM-7M vibes all over again being evaded by just rolling and yawing, i’ll just jump to another tree.
This Gaijin’s fetish of playing dirty to blufor with missile stats is disgusting.
A subsonic Fulcrum was out pulling my missile at 2000m today from 5km.
I really wonder what’s the source of R-77s pulling 50 G’s.
Propaganda.
Edit: I am not serious.
It more than possible, grid fins must be capable of that by their drag
In what world the missile that is equal to B variant of AMRAAM gets put against the A one
The 120B did not change its flight characteristics.
But changed in autopilot, maybe bring dual plane fins
In WT.
?type 93 fix when
Does it really have more range than before? Any proof?
Somewhere in one of 77’s discussion was video with comparsion.
In this thread? could you put the link pls
the r77-1 model is in the game but from what I remember they just barely reduced the drag otherwise it has all the same stats as the r77
I cant remember where but in real life there is a writing and a transcript of one of the desginers talking which explicitly states 40 or 45g, read it about 2 months ago, it was a forum involving 3 guys with degrees in physics pulling out declassified documents out of their ass