Update 2.37.0.63

No I’m talking about engine run up, commercial or fighter jet the procedure is the same.

And that is exactly what you do in engine run up, fire the engines at max power with parking brakes on.

It does, landing ger out => more drag => sooner thrust equalizes drag => plane stops accelerating sooner, this reaching less speed.
Less speed less drag on LNG.

I have pretty good idea from the NLG strut compression during power assurance check.

not with the LNG out…

neglectable

I did not say it is something you would exercise with passengers, I said that the AC can do it.

Not, it isn’t. there is no singe “procedure”, its different from plane to plane.

Most planes usually go to 20% power (idle) or 40-50% power before releasing brakes (rolling start), a few go to 100% power before releasing brakes (static start) but that is uncommon and only done when needed for a short takeoff.

see above.

oh yes, but that has nothing to do with what we are discussing. like at all. you are not going to reach Vmax before the gears break.

do tell, how much of the force goes into it instead of the brakes?

if lng is extended at those speeds. and yes, i think todays jet fighters could reach those speeds with lng out as they can reach M2.0+ with them folded in.

Are you sure? if say at landing the wheels didn’t rotate they would break of almost instantly from the frictional force from the ground or completely grind away if set down slow enough. all that initial energy goes into rotation.

true. But again, i highly doubt it.
V^2=U^2 + 2as
lets say landing speed is 125kt (~64m/s) and the goal is zero speed with a deceleration of 1G.
64^2=0 + 2 x 9,8 x s
(64^2)/(2 x 9).8 = s = ~ 209m

are you saying that the C680 can full stop in 209 m ?

No, I’m not talking about take off procedure. I’m talking ALL the time about ground engine test run. Full power, brakes on.

No you are not going to reach Vmax with gear out.

few hundred kilos

It would what but that does not matter if you are interested in strain on the LNG once you slam the brakes.

It is more like 400 since it is not a constant 1G rather the peak.

you wrote:

so i assumed takeoff. you have not written about engine test…

you and i are using different definitions of Vmax. i meant max possible speed at current conditions, not what the aircraft is capable of at optimal conditions.

so a few thousand N? that is quite a lot in comparison to the 25kN thrust per engine. if its like 500kg then that equates to like 10% of total engine power att full thrust (to tired to do the moment arm conversion).

if you slam the brakes to the point of wheel stoppage then i would agree.

sounds more reasonable. the way you wrote before made it sound like 1G sustained.

Engine run-up is the test…

What is an engine run-up?

Definition- An increase of engine RPM to a high power setting that is for testing an engine or aircraft components and aircraft systems. All high power or extended engine runs must be done at a designated run-up location.

It is accurate enough to demostrate that LNG would not go in 400-600km/h like now. I’m fine if LNGs would snap at Mach speed or so, but those low speeds brake offs are super annoying and unrealistic.

Still even some of the forces “leaks” through wheel rotation, rest is still significant. For a reference, yesterday I pulled logs from IRS and AC did peak -0.4G on a normal landing…

hello! I have a question: plz look at the website from Bilibili. 健康行动 93 (2.37.0.60 更新) - 哔哩哔哩 (bilibili.com)
I find sth really weird as the fig show below.


That is, ‘After the ARH missile goes active, the markings on the radar interface indicating the corresponding enemy aircraft position and hit time will not remain at the edge of the interface, and the missile will no longer occupy the radio channel, allowing the carrier to continue launching and guiding mid-range missiles.’
However when we check the changelog here it is obviously that that sentences were never mentioned. So is that true or fake?
IF that is fake.We all know that the jet need to provide guidance to the ARH missile (that is, the Data Link) before it switches its radar on.
Then what will happen if a player continue to TWS or TRK the same enemy even after the radar of ARH missile has already turned on and captured enemy?Will the missle continue to receive Data Link from the carrier or simply not following the Data Link anymore automatically?
And what will happen if a player continue to TWS or TRK the same enemy after the radar of ARH missile has already turned on yet not captured enemy?Will the Datalink still working to help ARH missile?
If an ARH missile has captured the enemy, but suddenly lost track, will the datalink still working to help ARH missile(the player kept the datalink on all the time)?
Hope anyone can clear up my doubts.