UNMODELED MACHINES GUNS and UNMODELED Small Armor Bits

[embergan]

I have noticed huge problems recently when playing ground battles and I have seen very few amount of people calling out WarThunder for their overall lack of care or effort when modeling most non-premium tanks

This is very evident with them not modeling lots of pieces of tanks. Most of what I am referring to is going to be USSR (Russia) based although I very strongly believe this has to do with lots of other nations. (This is because I main USSR {Russia})

Modeling of Machine Guns:
This has mostly to do with the newest IS-7 I have seen which has countless machine guns which got me thinking about how many other tanks have lots of machine guns and into my searching. I have seen some with lots of machine guns, they are just not modeled in the game.
So I got confused on why tanks like the PREMIUM IS-7 get all modeled machine guns but other tanks like the TECH TREE T-54 (1947) get machine guns but they are not modeled.
This makes no sense given that it seems ‘pay to win’ if you want an accurately modeled tank because WarThunder only cares to fully model premium tanks.

Image of IS-7’s Moddled Guns:

Image of T-54 (1947)’s Unmodded guns:

Modeling of Small Armor Parts:
This is mostly with the T-44 and the T-44 (100) when the T-44 (100) gets small parts of their turret head modeled although the T-44 doesn’t get it modeled giving the T-44 a stronger overall turret because that small unmodeled part can’t be penned and used as a fuse setter for the round.
Although this is also shown in the IS-2’s and IS-1 where their water splash guards are modeled (as armor) in one but not in the other and also with their headlights causing one to have their headlight modeled as steel but the other one not.

T44 (100) Modeled Top:

T44 UnModeled Top:

Please explain to me why this is your decision WarThunder or just PLEASE FIX THIS ISSUE. It doesn’t seem obvious why you wouldn’t because it seems like a generally very easy fix. I don’t want to be rude since I don’t have the most insight into the work at Gajin although I would really love to see a fix.

Please Reply if you notice any mistakes, since my English isn’t the best and not my first language. Many points I try to get across may be lost in translation. Or hard to follow please stay with me on this one and help me fix this. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH <3
(This has been changed and reviewed by myself 1 time(s) thanks to “soymilkman” and everyone else for the help)

[soymilkman]

Punctuation, and having a coherent message, may help you out here. 1937 T-54? Huh…

[YoTango]

maybe he talk about the t54 1947

[jaded_sakura77]

We got a time traveller here

[TheArcticFoxxo]

Cormac McCarthy 2: Rebirth of Antipunctuationism.

[TT33a]

Many machine guns on tanks are unmodelled or unoperational

I’m not the only person who noticed this but most hull and rear coaxial MGs(and, for the M2 medium tank, the roof MGs) are unmodelled or unoperational. This is a problem on M4s, T-28s, the M2 medium tank, T-34s, Panzer IIIs, Panzer IVs, Panzer Vs, Panzer IVs, Chi-Has, M13/40s KV-1 and 2s, IS-2s, M26s etc. All of these actually have MGs on that location, and i really wonder why they are not modelled. [image] [image] [image] [image] [image] [image] (Marked as primary or secondary weapon; …

[embergan]

Apologies for the incorrect punctuation, I plan on changing it when I figure out how to or just plan on fully rewriting this post. Thanks a lot for the heads-up though.

[embergan]

Thank you for linking this, I really want to see what WarThunder’s response is to topics like these and if they plan on ever changing it, or at least acknowledging it. That guy and the post that you linked really goes into more detail then I did, I really plan on readvising my post and changing it by going into more depth and adding picture of what I mean to get my point across more clearly.
Thank you again for the response!
Have a good day.

[embergan]

[embergan]

Alright, I have changed the post, thank you again very much, just please take into account that my English isn’t very good and that it isn’t my first language. Thank you again for the response. Have a good day!
(Remind me about any extra mistakes)

[embergan]

Jajaja. I am very sorry, I assume you mean about the T-54 (1937) I meant the T-54 (1947) sorry for the mix up and confusion. Although it has been changed! Thank you for the heads up! HAVE A GOOD DAY!!!

[embergan]

Sorry so much my English isn’t the best. Please remind me where and how I went wrong so I can change it. Thank you so much for your message. Have a good day!

[embergan]

Yes, I was talking about the T-54 1947. I am very sorry about that. It was very late in the morning I was writing that message so it was hard to read my keyboard.
Thank you so much for helping!!!
Have an amazing day!

[TheArcticFoxxo]

No problem, I’m just here to joke around.

[embergan]

Sounds fun!