Yes, Iron Fist. Unsure why they’re not going for the new KAPS in development, considering that’s also being used on the export N-WAV.
Speaking of the N-WAV, here’s some more photos. It really is gigantic.
5 Likes
+1. Best way to bring Korea into the game.
5 Likes
All hail supreme leader kim and the DPRK!
+1 to the game
2 Likes
My hopes are for at least 2 of them to come to life. The 1st might be to ambitious but it looks amazing
Korea Next Generation MBT
K2-ME or a similar armor package
Hanwha Biho II
Hanwha Tigon with 105mm or 30mm
6 Likes
For the ones that are interested in the North Korea vehicle developments, here are some nice picture :
- Here can you see the North Korean “Stryker” version from the outside and inside.
N.Korean Stryker outside
N.Korean Stryker outside 2
N.Korean Stryker inside
The link for more pictures : x.com
- Here is an proposal of the North Korean “Stryker” MGS version, i can’t tell what the armament will be but could maybe be a Chinese version of the 105mm
N.Korean MGS proposal
The link for more pictures : x.com
- At last we have another interesting Type 323 APC proposal which seems to support a 30 or 40 mm cannon. The proposal looks similar to the Chinese ZBD-04 without the 100mm cannon.
Future North Korean IFV?
Here the link : x.com
Another link where you can see it from different angles : x.com
4 Likes
I believe this is a mortar carrier, to replace the old 323-based one.
2 Likes
You right, i checked all the picture and it seems to be a new mortar carrier or a modernized version of it.
The official name of the so-called “M2020” tank has been revealed. Unfortunately, the image quality is low so it cannot be clearly identified. It looks like “천마-2x(Ch’ŏnma-2x)”.
7 Likes
From the M2020 (now Ch’ŏnma-2) thread:
Name plate that just about says <천마-2호> (Ch’ŏnma-2 Ho – Ho in this sense just meaning ‘type’, not part of the actual name)
1 Like
Very nice!
1 Like
I hope to see these Korean equipment join the game this year.
2 Likes
Yeah, it would be really nice to end a year on a bang with the United Korean TT.
1 Like
We can dream. One thing I think we can look at is the fact Gaijin hasn’t introduced any North or South Korean ground vehicles yet. Unlike, for example, Indian ground vehicles or Swiss planes to the UK and German tree respectively. To me that suggests they might be saving them for a proper tree, but it could also mean they just don’t want to add them at all lol.
1 Like
Collection of some very nice images from a 2016 parade:
- HD image of Ch’ŏnma-216 with the weapons package from the 2013 parade. Don’t recall seeing this image before, and it’s certainly the most detailed photo of this variant so very nice to see
- Close up of one of the 323 122mm, unable to tell whether M1977 or M1985
- Type 59s with provision for slat armour and 14.5mm KPV
- Chuch’e Po ‘M1989’ ‘Koksan’
- 323 MLRS
3 Likes
I think I would be fine for Korea to be treated somewhat like Israel (with the Merkava first appearing in the US tech tree first).
Many are clamoring for either the K1 or the K2 so it could be sort of a soft launch for a United Korea Tree.
1 Like
I wish we can get those like vehicle name plates as a separate cosmetic, they look so cool. Oh man I cant wait to get those Chonma-hos with the Iglas lol
1 Like
They do look very cool, but I’m not sure if Gaijin would want to add them lol, unfortunately. Might be too political for them
‘조선 인민의 철천지 원쑤인 미제침략자들을 소멸하라!’
‘Destroy the American imperialist invaders who are the bitter enemies of the Korean people!’
5 Likes
Wrong. The shenyang F-5 is marked as north korean.