?
afaik korea had 3BM42 at best but not 3BM44 unless you have info regarding that
3BM42 is APFSDS itself, 3BM44 is APFSDS+propellant. Not much a issue.
ah that’s right my bad then
This is the perfect solution. I totally agree with this
5 Likes
This is the most recent Australian AS-9 photo.
It appears that armor plates have been added
1 Like
I voted yes, perhaps as an incentive crew levels can start at lets say level 25 if the nation being added does not have rank 1 vehicles which allow for crew level ups.
Australia was developing a new armour package with an Israeli company for their AS9s, it was reported to end up becoming one of the best protected SPHs in class. Maybe that package has made progress/been applied.
This is not a M36B2, just a mordernized M36. There is a bug report for this.
During the Korean War, the United States donated M36s to South Korea and gave one of the same models to Japan for research.
During the Korean War, the Army of the Republic of Korea was supplied with some 216 M36 series Tank Destroyers. Above shows a unit of the 51st Tank Company, attached to the ROK Capital Division, and photographed while training on October 23, 1951. This is an M36E9, converted from an M10A1 with Ford V8 engine. Note the open engine deck doors with the debris catching “chutes” on the undersides, typical of M4A3 Shermans. Also visible is “USA 4046826.” This is the original Registration Number, indicating that it was accepted as an M10A1 at Ford Motor Company in March, 1943. 200 M36 conversions were completed at Montreal Locomotive Works from May through September, 1945. It is thought that most or all of these would have been the only M36s to have the E9 factory installed. Based on this and a small number of other photos, we would theorize that Montreal Locomotive did not assign new Registration Numbers to their M36 and M36B2 conversions. Instead, the original M10A1 or M10 Reg. Numbers were retained. The E9 Modification Work Order directed that, on Tank Destroyers, the 1/4 inch sloping armor below the sponson line be cut away, and this can be seen to good effect in the photo.
Source
Meanwhile, there is the M36E9, which is based on the chassis of the M10A1 produced in 1943, with the E9 suspension, 500 hp engine, and wider track. Perhaps one of the two models could be a premium/event vehicle.
4 Likes
Thank you for the correction! When I have a chance I’ll go and edit it o7
How long do I have to wait?
1 Like
I would really like to see this proposal come to fruition.
1 Like
That’s if this does there’s a leak flying around claiming Gaijin will go with putting North Korea with the CCP, and South Korea with the United States. Which I’m completely against.
3 Likes
I Agree.
5 Likes
I think if ROC and PRC, west and east germany are together, north and south korea deserve to be together.
I don’t wanna get poltical but it pains me when a country is split(especially as a chinese which is a huge advocate for peaceful reunification of ROC and PRC) so i want DPRK and ROK together.
9 Likes
I agree. Both countries have a lot of unique equipment.
Also, the both koreas are close in many ways and should not be released separately.
9 Likes
Agreed
even as a china main i think north and south korea should be together
7 Likes
Apart from being a Korean, this tech tree will have a lot of unique vehicles. Lots of people think that North Korean tech tree will be just copy and paste of China or Soviet, but except the original T-54 and T-62, other variants are basically completely different vehicles.
I am concerned since the aviation tech tree will just be Germany V2, with same vehicles of USA and USSR, but that could be solved from sub trees. This is quite a hard problem, but considering how Gaijin is adding sub trees, it will not be a big issue.
1 Like
ABSOLUTELY-as an independent Techtree of course
6 Likes
Never separated.
5 Likes