United Korea Ground Forces Tech Tree

My hopes are for at least 2 of them to come to life. The 1st might be to ambitious but it looks amazing

Korea Next Generation MBT

K2-ME or a similar armor package
IMG_1717

Hanwha Biho II

IMG_1720

Hanwha Tigon with 105mm or 30mm
IMG_1721

6 Likes

For the ones that are interested in the North Korea vehicle developments, here are some nice picture :

  • Here can you see the North Korean “Stryker” version from the outside and inside.
N.Korean Stryker outside

IMG_1736

N.Korean Stryker outside 2

IMG_1737

N.Korean Stryker inside

IMG_1738

The link for more pictures : x.com

  • Here is an proposal of the North Korean “Stryker” MGS version, i can’t tell what the armament will be but could maybe be a Chinese version of the 105mm
N.Korean MGS proposal

IMG_1743

The link for more pictures : x.com

  • At last we have another interesting Type 323 APC proposal which seems to support a 30 or 40 mm cannon. The proposal looks similar to the Chinese ZBD-04 without the 100mm cannon.
Future North Korean IFV?

IMG_1739

Here the link : x.com

Another link where you can see it from different angles : x.com

4 Likes

I believe this is a mortar carrier, to replace the old 323-based one.
fd87vbx7cx091

2 Likes

You right, i checked all the picture and it seems to be a new mortar carrier or a modernized version of it.

The official name of the so-called “M2020” tank has been revealed. Unfortunately, the image quality is low so it cannot be clearly identified. It looks like “천마-2x(Ch’ŏnma-2x)”.

7 Likes

From the M2020 (now Ch’ŏnma-2) thread:

Name plate that just about says <천마-2호> (Ch’ŏnma-2 Ho – Ho in this sense just meaning ‘type’, not part of the actual name)

1 Like

Chart of all of North Korea’s indigenous MBTs

10 Likes

Very nice!

1 Like

And now the chart of all SPGs

12 Likes

I hope to see these Korean equipment join the game this year.

2 Likes

Yeah, it would be really nice to end a year on a bang with the United Korean TT.

1 Like

We can dream. One thing I think we can look at is the fact Gaijin hasn’t introduced any North or South Korean ground vehicles yet. Unlike, for example, Indian ground vehicles or Swiss planes to the UK and German tree respectively. To me that suggests they might be saving them for a proper tree, but it could also mean they just don’t want to add them at all lol.

1 Like

Collection of some very nice images from a 2016 parade:

128317095_14447911526001n

  • HD image of Ch’ŏnma-216 with the weapons package from the 2013 parade. Don’t recall seeing this image before, and it’s certainly the most detailed photo of this variant so very nice to see

128317095_14447911528181n

  • Close up of one of the 323 122mm, unable to tell whether M1977 or M1985

128317095_14447911528961n

  • Type 59s with provision for slat armour and 14.5mm KPV

128317095_14447911528501n

  • Chuch’e Po ‘M1989’ ‘Koksan’

128317095_14447911528031n

  • 323 MLRS
3 Likes

I think I would be fine for Korea to be treated somewhat like Israel (with the Merkava first appearing in the US tech tree first).

Many are clamoring for either the K1 or the K2 so it could be sort of a soft launch for a United Korea Tree.

1 Like

I wish we can get those like vehicle name plates as a separate cosmetic, they look so cool. Oh man I cant wait to get those Chonma-hos with the Iglas lol

1 Like

They do look very cool, but I’m not sure if Gaijin would want to add them lol, unfortunately. Might be too political for them

‘조선 인민의 철천지 원쑤인 미제침략자들을 소멸하라!’
‘Destroy the American imperialist invaders who are the bitter enemies of the Korean people!’

5 Likes

Wrong. The shenyang F-5 is marked as north korean.

I’m aware.

1 Like

kk

1+ support of united korean, would only make sense seeing ROC and PRC together in 1 tree.

8 Likes