Soviet vehicles have always had a different set of rules
It does fit the criteria unfortunately. The criteria being as follows:
- If Russian then it will come to the game no matter what
- If not Russian then normal vehicle criteria will be selected
I guess we will see
We have said multiple times we have no current plans to speak of for the Su-47 or the EAP. Both are in the same boat.
No, you’ve only said you have no current plans for the EAP.
As I said made clear in my above comment, the only statement you’ve made on the SU-47 is that you have no current plans to speak of, which very clearly rather significantly changes the meaning of the statement.
You have categorically refused to say ‘we have no current plans for the SU-47 full stop’, whereas you were perfectly willing to make that statement regarding the EAP only a few days ago.
Go and enjoy your holiday smin.
The EAP has been treated no differently. You can see everything I said about it a couple of days ago:
I have just said that for you again. We have no current plans for either of them to speak off. Neither is different from the other.
If you are seeking some sort of hardline denial for the rest of time, thats not possible for the EAP or the Su-47. Because as we have said before, plans can always change as they have done before. But at this particular moment in time, neither are in any form of consideration.
Whenever we said that about any vehicles in the past, just for plans to change 5 or 10 years later, people took that as a “lie”. So we are not going to simply ever say nothing is ever possible for the rest of time that way. Just be transparent about our current plans.
I will thank you. I still however check in on my tags from time to time and this came up, which obviously needed clarification.
Fantastic, that is the first time such a statement has been made with clarity and without evasive and non-committal language. This is all I wanted to hear, thank you.
Are people still yapping on about EAP? Thought that would of been put to sleep by now. It ain’t coming whether we like it or not.
They’ll still be yapping about it after GTA 6
The issue was that the Su-47 had been rumoured a few times, with non-committal answers about it and the Su-47 is in the exact same boat as the EAP. So if one got added and the other hard denied, it would be incredibly unfair and hypocritical
Rumours are often wrong, it’s fair game to leave gaijin in peace as long as they don’t add it, doing otherwise would be like blaming your partner because they cheated on you in your dream
I’m sure that when every last possible variant of every British and commonwealth jet is in game the EAP will come, probably only as event but I have no doubt whatsoever we will see it.
The snail has a long history or contradicting itself.
OLD post, But one thing id say is swap the FR.5 Variant of the Swift, for the F.4 Model.
The FR.5s were just F.4s converted into Recon aircraft, so they were heavier and less agile than the F.4 was. Plus the FR.5 went back to just 2 ADEN’s, while the F.4s carried 4 of them.
A properly implemented F.4 would be a Menace, 4 guns, and agility leagues better than the F1, or F7 swifts.
I mean, as much as that would be great, I think it would probably end up at 9.0, either way, if I ever do update this in future, I will try and remember to include it
I want Cheetah and its variants!
Cheetah C with V3B / S and R-Darter! Cheetah E with V3B/C (it was before C variant) .
And event plane Cheetah D, the one with RD-33 engine , armament is same with C.
The british on researchable vehicles tech tree lack early 1st gen fighter aircraft turbojet engine 6.3 ~ 7.0 (2nd line)
And none attack aircraft to 6.3 ~ 7.3 (4th line)
METEOR MARK I!!!
AIRACOMET MK I!!!
METEOR TRENT!!!
SEAFANG!!!
SPITEFUL!!!
I don’t know another interceptor aircraft & night fighter between Welkin F Mk I & Hornet Mk III (5.0 ~ 5.7)
But future interceptor aircraft & night fighter to 6.3 ~ 6.7

Vickers Type 432 for the 5.0-5.7 maybe?
not aware of anything thats not already there for the 6.3-6.7 area that isnt already up there
Not A-Darters, U-Darters.

